Talk:Steve Orlando

Photo
Steve Orlando contacted me personally about the photo, wondering why I had reverted it back to the earlier one. I replied as follows (copied here for transparency):


 * Thanks for asking. It's mainly a stylistic choice for Wikipedia. The Manual of Style for biographical articles calls for traditional portraits, "the type of image used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works". That generally means a neutral head-and-shoulders shot, rather than a more creative or flattering one appropriate for promotional materials. I understand why you like the newer one more, but I think the other photo is more stylistically appropriate for an encyclopedia (rather than for the dust-jacket of your next hardcover). I’ve seen more than a few debates on WP over which of two photos to use, and when there’s a choice between one of someone with their eyes scrunched up with a big smile, and one of them staring blankly into space, the latter wins. It better fits the goals of project.


 * The other reason I switched it back is a legal issue. To include a photo in Wikipedia, it needs to be licensed for use by anyone, for any reason, with no royalties, and it seemed doubtful that “User:Comicfan227”, who claimed it was "my own work" when they uploaded it, actually had the authority to do that. And their explanation of the change – because you wanted it – isn’t how Wikipedia makes such choices, any more than the subject of an article automatically gets to decide what it *says* about them.


 * Obviously, if you own the photo we could fix the licensing, but... I honestly think the other picture is more “encyclopedic”. On the other hand, if you have a more recent photo of that type, and which you can give away the rights to, I’d be happy to help get that into place, because we don't reject a photo *just because* the subject provides it, either. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)


 * He's uploaded another photo that's a better fit for an encyclopedia article (and is properly licensed), which is now being used in the article. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)