Talk:Steve Purcell/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –MuZemike 04:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Article is very well-written. Images have good fair-use rationales (I did reduce the filesizes of them a bit more.) and the free image is verified as CC-BY-SA 2.0 and properly licensed. While it is short, it does cover all the bases. Finally, I don't see any pressing verifiability or prose issues. I tried to further spruce up the prose a little bit (if I made any mistakes regarding British English usage, please go ahead and correct it), but it looked very well done. There's only one thing that need to be issued before I pass, and that is this this deadlink in ref #35.

Two other things you may want to do as well: make sure to add in alt text when you can, and try to incorporate what is in that first image's caption into the article (to get rid of the citation). –MuZemike 04:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Alright, the dead link has been bolstered with a link from webarchive. Its lost its presentation, but the information is still there. Alt text is in the article. As for the caption citation, there isn't really a convenient place to move that into the article, but I think its still reasonably effective in the caption. Thanks for the copyedit, I wouldn't worry too much about inadvertantly changing to American English; Purcell's American, so its probably more appropriate. -- Sabre (talk) 12:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, for some reason I overlooked the alt text already there. You may want to put alt text, however, in that File:Sam-and-max.png file located in the Sam & Max navbox. Anyways, passed. Good work! –MuZemike 15:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)