Talk:Steven Moore (author)

Untitled
Holy cow! The wikieditors who put the notability/primary source warning on the Moore page are a bunch of idiots. Moore is one of the most prolific and highly regarded critics around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.168.142 (talk) 02:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Author here: If I publish something new, what's wrong with adding it? Bibliographical notices are neutral and easily verifiable. Am I supposed to wait around for someone with a Wiki account to notice I've published something new and take the initiative to add it, which may take months or years? Shouldn't Wiki entries be as up-to-date as possible? As long as I'm not adding false info, I don't see what the problem is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smoore3 (talk • contribs) 06:54, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Rewritten article
Hi,

My last edit has been flagged as vandalism, but I obviously don't agree. I've rewritten the article by removing a lot of unnecessary information but retaining the main points - Moore's expertise on Gaddis, his work at Dalkey, some praise by big names such as Franzen and Manguel. This hardly can be seen as giving him a bad name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.50.204.18 (talk) 10:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)