Talk:Steven Seagal: Lawman

Improving the article
Xeworlebi, Naming the debut episode just makes the section more complete, in my opinion, but this is a very minor qualm with your edit.. I can maybe see your point about a synopsis section. I am, however, grateful you retained the section about questions over Seagal's qualifications. GeorgeC (talk) 04:58, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The only thing I've removed from this article was the quote. My reasoning for that was that it is explained in the History section and it didn't really fit anywhere else. I found the lead/article proportions to be wrong, the lead should be a small but global overview of the article's topic, the rest should be in clear sections. I changed the qualifications section name to criticism because it was too long, and it seemed to me that it fitted perfectly in criticism. A section name should be short and informative. I'm glad this article is getting some attention though, just trying to improve the layout of the page and make it more clear.  X  eworlebi (t•c) 05:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I can see your point. I kind of agree, but to me the inclusion of the opening statement could work if the right place could be found. GeorgeC (talk) 07:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Grammar/Style
The editors working on this article need to improve their writing skills. It is written in a base vernacular akin to street speak or the 'hood. Sorry but improvement requires a complete rewrite.

Unaired episode/Resumption of season 2
Throwing out the idea of removing the original air date for the season 2 episode entitled "Under the Influence." The episode was scheduled to air on November 10, 2010, but as far as I can tell, it never did. Also, as there has been no official word from A&E about the resumption of season 2 episodes, I think the part about "Second season episodes are currently airing." should be removed or amended. --72.147.59.175 (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)