Talk:Stock-flow consistent model

Overly technical content
The first version of this article reads like a textbook and seems to assume significant prior knowledge of economics, particularly the "Transaction Flow Matrix" section. It would be useful to further explain why this model is significant in economics and exactly what the matrix fields represent. -Xpctr8 (talk) 14:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

I have removed the more technical terms such as transaction flow matrix and has replaced it with rather simple terms. I have also written more explanation as can be seen in my newly submitted article. Could you review it again. Thanks.


 * Sounds like a brain dump from someone reading Wynne Godley or Gennaro Zezza. It definitely needs improvement. Miguel (talk) 14:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Black holes
What do you mean by "the consistent accounting framework prevents the modellers to leave "black holes" i.e., unexplained parts of the model."? --Pierre de Lyon (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Advantages and disadvantages section
It seems that all that is listed in this section, at the moment, are advantages. Perhaps people need to write down what the disadvantages are or rename the section. 2003:C7:F725:D738:E494:270F:4537:FEF6 (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2022 (UTC)