Talk:Stoke Space

The funding record isn't noteworthy
Am I alone in thinking the accounting they've done over the years isn't that interesting? $100,000,000 here, another few million there. It barely qualifies as "history", what in this section sets them apart from any other start-up? It reads like an overly enthusiastic blog. 2A02:C7C:D5F6:A300:E4A0:6532:6E3B:2EF5 (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Funding history is pretty commonly included in articles for startups, especially younger startups with no revenue. The paragraph for the Series A round could probably be condensed though. StereoFolic (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * took a shot at it StereoFolic (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree, it could be condensed, as their funding isn't too important regarding the technologies the company is developing, probably good to talk about their social media presence and their recent tests. TeeboTibo (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)