Talk:Stone Table/Archive 1

Redirecting of Aslan's How
Currently, Stone Table redirects to Aslan's How. I think this is misleading - they both deserve to be separate articles, or else Aslan's How should be a subsection of Stone Table, which I believe is more significant and widely known. Chris Thornett 08:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I would agree Aslan's How should not be the main article - at least not for both - here's why:


 * The Stone Table is more widely known, as The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is much more widely read than the rest of the series
 * Aslan's How wasn't the name of the hill until long after the major event at the Stone Table (Aslan's resurrection).
 * The Stone Table was an important magical item; Aslan's How was just a convenient meeting place.
 * My suggestion would be that Stone Table be the main article for the time being, with a section on Aslan's How (which could be expanded into its own article if there was enough information) --Tim4christ17 talk 12:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I support this. Makes sense -- after all, readers who have only read LWW will know "Stone Table" over "Aslan's How." --Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 15:06, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes, the name of the article must be stone table. There is although no need of having a sub-section as Aslan's How, but, it can be said in the first line that After the incident as Stone Table in The lion...and the wardrobe, the stone table became to be known as Aslan's How. The first book in the series is The lion...the wardrobe. Thus many people will have read only that book. So they will be knowing Aslan's How as stone table. I agree for stone table.Srinivas G Phani (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)