Talk:Stonelayer

Merger Proposal
I propose that Stone line be merged into Stonelayer. I think that the content in the Stone line article can easily be explained in the context of Stonelayer, and the Stonelayer article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Stone line will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Paleorthid (talk) 02:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Rename Proposal
I had thought to propose that Stonelayer be renamed but I am now satisfied the article name is best kept as isStonelayer. It is the preferred term for a biomantle and bioturbation context. -- 3rd edit -- Paleorthid (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2016 (UTC)