Talk:Storm (Marvel Comics)/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

As part of WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I am re-reviewing this article to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below and needs a bit of work. Due to the amount of issues I am boldly delisting the article. Remember that you can renominate any time you feel it meets criteria. I don't watchlist old reviews, so direct any comments to my talk page. Thanks, -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 14:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Lead section does not adequately cover the article content as per WP:LEAD.
 * There is a large amount of overlap between #Publication History and #Fictional character biography that should be eliminated; we don't need to hear discussions of her origins and marriage repeatedly (my suggestion is to merge the relevant content into publication history and contextualize it with real-world information.)
 * The article is not broad in coverage; there is little in the way of reception information. Even Storm's new-wave punk style is not seriously commented upon. This is a major issue and gap in coverage.
 * Small, stubby or otherwise questionable sections: The one-line "Awards" section and the "Bibliography" section, which probably should be axed (its contents are unclear and due to Wikipedia's use of bibliography for sourcing should be renamed in necessary.)
 * Multiple citation needed templates throughout.