Talk:Storm Large

Talk page
Can I remind you that the talk page for an article is to discuss ways to improve the article and that on Wikipedia we discourage personal attacks? Please take this discussion to another venue if you feel the need to continue. Thanks. Katr67 04:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Good lord, never mind, I read the history of the discussion page. This probably needs to be locked down or something to stop this back and forth silliness. LBY3, September 7, 2006

Christian Rap???
can somebody more familiar with Ms. Large's work remove the reference to Christian Rap if she in fact does not perform this? I suspect that she does not, but since I don't know for sure, won't remove this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.5.209.2 (talk) 16:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Continual Rockstar: Supernova additions
There's been someone/some people continually adding Storm's weekly performances on Rockstar: Supernova, the first time I reverted because it doesn't seem relevant to her biographical information! After all, if someone wanted to read about Storm on Supernova, wouldn't you go to the Rockstar Supernova page? The weekly performances blurbs IMO just clutters up the page. Thoughts? Irisx 00:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This is what I have been doing with every other Rock Star: Supernova article, Storm is the only one who still has this up. I removed it again. --Kuckzul 21:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Usage of Infobox
I put the appropriate infobox up there tonight. I left the variables that I did not know or were not appropriate blank. But the point is, I left them up there so future editors can fill them in correctly. Thanks -- immunity 04:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Images Used in Article
Hi everyone, I'm Adam Lundeen, appointed representative of Storm Large and Copyright-holder of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Storm_Large.jpg

We'd very much like to see this image (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:StormKingsArmsJune07.jpg) not appear on this article. Nothing personal against the photographer, It's just not a good representation of her, and the real problem is that promoters, event planners, etc sometimes find that image on this Wiki article and use it for promotional pieces which causes confusion and issues.

I first attempted to add her official Bio image (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Storm_Large_Biography_Photo.jpg) which was released by the photographer for that purpose, but it still gets flagged as a copyright violation. So now I've added an image that I took myself of her (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Storm_Large.jpg) and released it under a Commons license. I understand that it is low resolution. I will take a higher resolution version as soon as I can, but in the meantime it would be great if the current image (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Storm_Large.jpg) can stay and (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:StormKingsArmsJune07.jpg) would not appear.

Please let me know if this is acceptable to the Wikipedia standards. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by R3dw88d (talk • contribs) 22:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

EP section
I added the content from the Ladylike EP article into the main article. The Ladylike EP article has a redirect to Storms main article due to wp:nalbum. I understand the rules but it means that minor and early releases miss out on details, which makes no sense if someone has made the effort to create them. Curiously I cannot see any notability defence on the Crazy Enough album page (awards, chart placement, etc), but it seems to have survived for quite a while. AVandewerdt (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Article title
Why is it in italics? DJgood2go (talk) 15:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Fixed. When added the Ladylike EP section with an infobox, the editor failed to put the italics=no parameter in the album infobox; such infoboxes are meant to be used in standalone article and not in this fashion, so without that parameter they automatically italicize the article title as the title of a work per the MOS. Whether or not the section on that EP should exist here as presented is not for me to say. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)


 * I appreciate it. DJgood2go (talk) 19:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)