Talk:Storm Warning (audio drama)

title/disambig
Do we have the right to hog Storm Warning for the Doctor Who audio? The two books have a fair number of links to them, and even though the 1951 film doesn't have an article yet it sounds like it's probably notable for its cast, if nothing else. Should we move this to Storm Warning (Doctor Who audio)? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree - I was searching for "storm warning" and came across this page instead. I've moved it as you suggested and redirected Storm Warning to Storm warning. (Generally speaking, the difference between "W"arning and "w"arning isn't considered sufficient for avoiding errors. --Ckatz chat spy  09:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Apologies, I've still got a few links to update with regards to this move. I'll try to get to them as quickly as possible. Thanks. --Ckatz chat spy  02:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I changed a lot of links so they now link to Storm Warning (Doctor Who audio) instead of Storm warning - Antmusic 23:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for doing so - and my apologies for not getting back to this in due course. It's been a busy time, both on and off-wiki, but I regret the inconvenience nevertheless. Cheers. --Ckatz chat spy  05:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem-o, I fix 'em when I see 'em. Nothing annoys me more when I click a link to read more about something and it brings me to something un-exact or a disambiguation page. There were only about 20 links, and they were easy to find with the "What links here" on the Storm warning page. - Antmusic 15:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Quality Assessment
Start Class:


 * The article contains a useful picture or graphic
 * There are multiple links to websites with more info on the topic
 * There is one subheading which fully treats an element of the topic - the cast section and a useful info box

Importance Scale:

Mid - While the story is notable within Doctor Who field it is unknown outside of this--Amxitsa (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)