Talk:Strand, London/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 20:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Will review tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * "Part of its length was known in the 13th century" -do we know which part?
 * Another source says it was a name of the whole street generally, so I've copyedited this Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Link Civil War in first instance, remove in modern times section?
 * Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * In the Somserset House paragraph can you reword a few examples of "house", it is repeated quite a lot.
 * Try that Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Watch rep of "popular" in second paragraph of Modern era
 * Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * " King's College Hospital opened in 1840, and the college became a constituent college of the University of London in 1908. " -shouldn't the latter part of this follow on from where you mention the college rather than the hospital?
 * I think the confusion here is where "college" refers to the term generally, and of the formation of an integrated University of London, reworded. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Can see little wrong with it, will pass once addressed.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Doubtless the masses will descend and copyedit it if it hits DYK, but that's not actually a bad thing. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  14:17, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Excellent work!♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:58, 6 March 2016 (UTC)