Talk:Strange Attractors

Strange Attractors
It may be worth mentioning that the explanation Gretchen gives for Strange Attractors is completely bogus. She explains them as attraction between magnetic particles (Physics), while in reality strange attractors are a concept in mathematics. An attractor is a stable set to which a dynamical system converges with time. A strange attractor is an attractor that displays chaotic behaviour. Rlinfinity (talk) 04:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It is irrelevant; we do not point out such errors, as it is fiction after all. — Edokter  •  Talk  • 11:13, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It isn't irrelevant. When fiction makes reference to science it is the norm to point out something as egregiously and laughably off the mark as this one. (For example, there is a scientific inaccuracies section for many books and movies such as, say, Jurassic Park. The explanation given in this episode is nowhere near the real meaning. It is about as wrong as suggesting that a Chimpanzee is a type of rocketship. 90.222.51.206 (talk) 21:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Strange Attractors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091201112442/http://www.nbcumv.com/mv/ to http://www.nbcumv.com/mv/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)