Talk:Stratovision

Stratovision and education
I wish that people who love to edit the creative work of others would resist the impulse to act as judge of a work when it is clear from the dates of historical entry that it is a work in progress. The reason why I originally added education as a category is because one of the biggest uses of Stratovision was educational television which lasted for a period of years. Unfortunately I have to sleep, eat, do other things in life and so I can't do everything immediately. So next time you get the urge to delete, pause first then even take the time to send the editor a note enquiring why such and such is so. You might get a friendly reply. The other way shows a degree of superioritiy in attitude and that only tends to irk other people who are creating the content and without content there is no encyclopedia. MPLX/MH 05:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Oh, grow up. Your articles get edited, deal with it. Don't want to give up ownership of your work? You can leave. Rhobite 05:27, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)


 * Why are you so rude and why do you launch into a personal attack? I contribute to Wikipedia and my contributions have creative value. I don't appreciate being addressed in this way. Is it possible for you to use a civil tone and drop me a friendly note if there is something that is not clear? Would that be too much to ask of you? I don't think that others would appreciate being told to leave and I don't believe that this is in the spirit of Wikipedia. I do appreciate those who tidy stuff up and add links and so on, but your behavior is uncalled for and yes, I am offended by it. MPLX/MH 06:04, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Regarding content: I have now added sections dealing with education, propaganda and the temporary nature of the service today. I have other material in my personal files concerning the use of Stratovision technology by the USA in Vietnam and other locations and I intend to add this material on a time permitting basis. MPLX/MH 06:04, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Picture
I have added article picture, with two of the test participants (Frank Mullins, C.E. Nobles) identified. It would be great to identify more of the people in this picture! Andrew Koontz (talk) 18:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)