Talk:Strawberry Panic!/Archive 4

Move Etoile section?
I'm thinking of moving the Etoile section to be a subheading of schools, what do you think? Kyaa the Catlord 17:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it's a good idea. Just let me edit the section a bit and I'll do it.--Juhachi 18:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ooops. I'll self-revert. Kyaa the Catlord 18:18, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Trivia
I removed the trivia section, mainly because it's lack of enclyopedic worth. If anyone disagrees, feel free to add it back in. H ig hway Return to Oz...  11:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Anime Section
The anime section starts off with a "main article" link to the list of episodes. This is misleading to readers as the list does not exactly discuss the anime. A little hard to articulate what I'm trying to say here, but what I mean is that a fitting use of the "main article" template would be if we had one dedicated article for the animated series (which may detail differences from other media and things specific to the anime), in which it may be named something like "Strawberry Panic! (anime)". The link should either be incorporated in the anime section differently or remain at the top but with a different template. --Remy Suen 14:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Another GA try
Shall we? Kyaa the Catlord 14:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well...I suppose we can try. We still haven't resolved much of what was left with the last one as the Media section's subsections of Light Novel, Manga and Video Game are still sub-par in information. But I don't know where else to get the info from because I don't have access to those media types other than the first volume of the manga which I've downloaded. -- (' 十八  |  talk ') 03:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

The original media
Only the beginning of the article mentions the short stories


 * "Strawberry Panic! began as a collection of short stories serialized in the Japanese bishōjo magazine Dengeki G's Magazine"

I think it would make more sense if there was more information on these stories was added to the media section, because the short stories are the "original media" which gave life to the other works.

-- Psi edit 21:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I was the one that included that information, and I obtained it through a post on the AnimeSuki forum I came across back in May when I first started building up this article. Here it is, where it states:


 * Strawberry Panic! started as a short novel (short stories) being serialized in the bishoujo magazine Dengeki G's Magazine (bishoujo magazines are aimed at male audience).


 * The short stories finished serializing in the bishoujo magazine Dengeki G's Magazine, but the short story novel was not collected in a tankoubon.

I'll go and site the source in the article, but unless the Japanese Wikipedia article can be translated, we can't go very much farther into the short stories. -- (' 十八  |  talk ') 01:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Anime to Manga Differences
Quoting the current content:

"Major differences between the anime and manga mostly centers around the plot and character interaction. The manga investigates the physical aspects of the lesbian themes further than the anime, which focuses mostly on their relationships together."

Are there more? KyuuA4 20:41, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * From what I've seen from the manga, it seems that the plot progresses much more quickly and we find out about Kaori rather soon. Character designs are a bit different, but that's like most manga to anime conversions so it's not a major thing to list. I've only read about 8 of the manga chapters, and another thing was that the Etoile Election process is a major plot point from the first or second chapter on while the anime waits until the later part of the series to touch on it for the dramatic effect. However, there are still the Amane/Hikari and Nagisa/Shizuma pairings though Nagisa and Shizuma are participating in the election process, unlike in the anime where it was with Nagisa and Tamao. Other than all that, I can't think of anything else. -- (' 十八  |  talk ') 02:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Astraea Hill name change
Per [http://www.gomanga.com/manga/strawberrypanic.php the official Seven Sea's Entertainment SP! website] it is shown that they have chosen to translate the name as Astrea instead of the more correct Astraea. I have changed the name in the article to reflect this.-- (' 十 ' 八 ) 19:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

GA re-nomination
After improving this article some, I have re-nominated this article for Good Article status. -- (' 十 ' 八 ) 07:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

GA On Hold
This article has been put on hold as this article could use a reactions and criticisms section and possibly other sections that are indirectly related to the anime to help show a more out-of-universe perspective in the article. This article is otherwise very good and is GA worthy. If you feel that this review is in error feel free to take it to WP:GA/R. Tarret 22:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Ga Passed
This article has passed the GA noms. The following are bot-generated suggestions for improvement:

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question. You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Tarret 23:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
 * This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.[?]
 * Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
 * Now that this article is GA, I propose we archive everything from this approval and before for a 'fresh start'. --Remy Suen 13:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with this since I'm going to try for an FA soon.-- 十  八  13:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Massive oversight
The article does not contain any information on things like the anime related sound tracks that were produced, nor what the OP/ED songs were. This is fairly standard info for anime series articles. Question2 12:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You must have overlooked it, because that information is provided in the Audio CDs section in the first paragraph.-- 十  八  12:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea, who care? Because the girls in the ending sequence really blow the anime. Just kidding. I love Yuri. Kannazuki no Miko, My Hime and stuffs =D Shrine Maiden 16:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Rokujou Miyuki
I propose to add Rokujou Miyuki to the Major Characters Section. She is important to the storyline (Etoile Election, Kaori backstory, relationship with Shizuma). -Shirohana 12:31, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but no can do. She was not in the original short stories and was only created by the manga/light novel stage. Those 12 main characters have always been vastly important to the plot, and the opening sentence of that section tells the reader that more characters were later added to create plot lines, which is exactly why Miyuki and the others were introduced.-- 十  八  14:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Eh, nice. Plot purpose. But honestly, isn't it quite 3 (Novel, Manga, Anime)vs1? Original material above all, huh. -Shirohana 18:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * More like 3 vs. 3. The material that had the original 12 were:


 * 1) Original short stories, numbering 30 in all
 * 2) Supplemental biographies, numbering 5 in all
 * 3) Visual novel


 * Material which incorperated the new characters:


 * 1) Manga
 * 2) Light novel
 * 3) Anime


 * And the image to the right has the 12 original characters, plus we should try to focus on how this series began. And as I already stated, the sentence at the beginning of that section explains that more characters were later added, and the characters section is large enough as it is without introducing the new characters; that's why there is a List of Strawberry Panic! characters main article for that.-- 十  八  19:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, so original material above all indeed, since 3vs3 is still even. But okay, this discussion is done. -Shirohana 15:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Grade system table
where was this obtained from? I'd like to have the site to use as a citation for another article. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 01:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * There wasn't any source attributed to it. In the anime, they explain the grading system, and mention how 4th grade at Astrea is like the first year of high school in regular Japanese schools, and the equivalent there in America is 10th grade, so it was just matching up the equivalents of the three school system's grades.--  十  八  01:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Lulim is the offical spelling
Seen at this official MediaWorks website, it can plainly be seen that Lulim is the official romanization of the third school, so if you please, stop changing it.--  十  八  19:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Sales
The sentences in the Sales section under Reception seem to be rather repetitive, which kills readability. The info. can be better arranged as a table. KyuuA4 19:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Demographic
What demographic is this aimed at? It seems a little too feminine to be a seinen, but the lesbanism means strainght girls might be put off. Kung Foo 23:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's really that feminine, not like shōjo series, and keep in mind that this is a Japanese series, and the Japanese may mix elements together, but in the end there is usually only one demographic. As such, it's rather simple to see if a series is shōjo, shōnen, or seinen by the content of the series and how the plot and characters are depicted. Not to mention that the series began as serialized stories in Dengeki G's Magazine, which is a seinen bishōjo game magazine, and the manga for the series was serialized in the same magazine. So I would definitely put this series under seinen.--  十  八  02:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for clearing that up! I have to say, I like how it does seem to be a guy's version of certain Shojo/Josei manga; girls can watch any kinda anime, because being tomboyish isn't exactly frowned upon, but us guys have a large genre of anime/manga (the more light hearted romancy stuff) closed off. Thank god that thanks to this we get some experience in a major manga genre.  Plus it's a nice diversion from the more combat-heavy/complexity-laden stuff I usually watch.     Kung Foo 19:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Manga last run date
The Japanese Wikipedia says that the manga ended 04/2007. However, I can't really read Japanese that well, so I can't tell if the page says anything in detail about the manga's cancellation or a third volume. So, could anyone who can read Japanese take a look at the Japanese wiki? MayumiTsuji 20:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)MayumiTsuji
 * I've known about this for some time. The manga version had it's last appearance in the April 2007 issue of Dengeki G's Magazine, but the story was not finished. They might restart it some day, but for now the manga is unfinished and is officially on "indefinite hiatus"; in other words, MediaWorks has not officially announced that the manga has been canecelled.--  十  八  01:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * To avoid confusion and maintain consistency with the Japanese wikipedia article, the stop date of April 2007 (4/2007) has been added to the main infobox, with a "halted before conclusion" indicator. Animeresearcher (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Juhachi, for correcting the stop date. However, shouldn't it be made somewhat more clear that the manga was stopped before the conclusion of the story? "Discontinued" may seem ambiguous to readers. Animeresearcher (talk) 19:37, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't need to say everything in the infobox. A quick read of the manga section will tell the reader that the story was unfinished. I just thought that "discontinued" carried the same meaning as "halted before conclusion", but with less wording.--  十  八  21:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

ANN DVDs review
Anime News Network has reviewed the first DVD of Strawberry Panic. -Malkinann (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC) ANN has declared SP to be rental-worthy. -Malkinann (talk) 02:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Review of the second DVD. -Malkinann (talk) 00:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC) Review of the third DVD. -Malkinann (talk) 00:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/strawberry-panic/sub.dvd-1
 * http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/shelf-life/2008-06-09
 * http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/strawberry-panic/sub.dvd-2
 * http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/review/strawberry-panic-third-wheel/sub.dvd-3
 * All incorporated.--  十  八  01:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Cheers. :) -Malkinann (talk) 01:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Mange reviews
ANN manga omnibus

--KrebMarkt (talk) 19:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Part of the Reception section
Does anyone mind if the mention of the voting about "to determine who would be the subjects in the couplings between the characters of each respective school" was clarified for casual readers? It just seems lacking without that. Flyer22 (talk) 01:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I rewrote the first sentence; is it clearer now?--  十  八  03:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for listening to my suggestion and even following through with it. I like it better now that you have tweaked it. In reading it, I simply felt that it did not specify on what the whole poll voting thing is about (even though the Production section goes into detail about that; specifying it). And, yeah, I still feel that it should specify a little more, but this article is really good, regardless, as you know. Adding a little more to it is not something to be stressed about right now, of course. I am not sure what to add there either at the moment. If I do add a little more to it, I would hope you approve of the addition. If you do not, then I do not mind terribly if it was tweaked or reverted. We could always discuss changes.


 * Anyway, thanks again. Flyer22 (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Title
why does the title have an exclamation point if the logo doesnt???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.176.77 (talk) 17:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's explained in the third paragraph of the lead.--  十  八  21:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It would, perhaps, be less of a problem if the article used a cover scan of the Japanese version of volume 1, instead of just a logo? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

actually even the manga has it without the exclamation point. and the game aswell.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.249.176.77 (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The English manga version excludes the exclamation mark; the video game has it, or did you not look at the images?


 * As for Dino's comments, the original material was never collected into volumes and sold separately outside of Dengeki G's Magazine. The later material including the manga and light novels were adaptations, along with the anime, video game, etc. Because of this, the infobox image has remained unchanged from its uploading back in 2006. While I suppose it wouldn't be much of a problem to use either the first light novel or manga covers in the infobox, I still never went ahead and did it because 1) They're adaptations and 2) No one has really said anything about the infobox image up to this point.--  十  八  21:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Whoa, it was never originally collected? Forgive the probably stupid question, but is this mentioned in the article anywhere? As for the image, I'm not gonna raise a fuss over it, but generally logos are frowned upon for infobox images, so I may not be the last one to ask about it. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 22:09, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, in the Short stories section: None of the original stories were ever published again in bound volumes.. As for the logo, I realize that logos have been generally phased out, though this one might be a tiny exception, at the very least because the normal conventions cannot really be applied to it.--  十  八  01:05, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Then wouldn't it be much simpler by just adding the Logo with the exclamation point? i mean it feels a little annoying seeing the name different from the logo.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC) After looking at the fist novel image, i don't believe it had the exclamation point. Do yo uhave a bigger picture to show that it does? We could have just posted that picture instead of the logo.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The Japanese version of the first light novel has the exclamation point; as I said, the English versions excluded it from the manga and light novels. And just to be absolutely clear, that light novel (and the other two printed later) were adaptations and are not to be confused with the short stories which are the basis for the series and which were never collected into bound volumes (as in, they were only published in Dengeki G's Magazine). As such, there is no cover for the original material.--  十  八  01:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

then it's really simple then, just look for a strawberry panic logo with an exclamation point.Bread Ninja (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there a title page or cover from Dengeki G's Magazine with the logo and one or more characters? You could use that instead of just a logo by itself. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There were cover pages used in the magazine, but they generally have a lot of other stuff on them, in addition to an illustration, such as with the first cover using the first logo design or the fourth cover using the second logo design. However, as luck would have it, there was one decent cover using the third logo design (and the last one used for the short stories). I think the last one is best as it only has a side strip of extra kanji, and not only features a large logo, but was the only cover to include all twelve of the original characters. I would be okay with uploading this image into the infobox.--  十  八  01:02, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ooh, that last one definitely looks nice! Go ahead and upload it, I'd say. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:25, 5 September 2009 (UTC)