Talk:Street Fighter (UDON comics)

Untitled
I removed this text from the Street Fighter article, and created this one. --Lošmi 11:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Too many headers
I attempted to organize the article a little more cleanly. I'm not entirely familiar with the comics series, so if someone believes it should be done differently, please go ahead. Khaotika 18:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No move. Cúchullain t/ c 15:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Street Fighter (comic book) → Street Fighter (UDON) – It's multiple comic books. Niemti (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Nah, "comic book" is already understandable. I also found the guidelines for naming of this type of article, they say to use "(comic book)". --Enric Naval (talk) 13:22, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Yah, "comic book" indicated a singular book. It's multiple books, in multiple series. There are also Street Fighter comics that were not by UDON, but by Malibu (not even counting the various manga and manhua titles), and so the title is misleading in more than way. --Niemti (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Udon is a type of noodle. But seriously, "comic book" is readily understandable and its use is consistent across articles. DrKiernan (talk) 20:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Newsflash: it's UDON, not "udon". "Book" is singular, and it's not even a single series. --Niemti (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:

*UDON? Should this say comics? Apteva (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

It needs the writers and the artists
That's before like perhaps adding more plot, reception, and so forth. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 11:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Better cover art
Just asking but isn't there any other cover art that is more appropriate then Cammy in a 'sensual' pose? Like some group art with the world warriors or simply Ryu, Chun-Li and Ken in a battle position? Something like that?78.77.143.79 (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

I agree. It would be better to have something more representative of the series than the current guest cover that references a meme. Perhaps the cover of Street Fighter #1 would be better? 114.198.67.238 (talk) 09:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * ^Yeah. Not to mention that Frank Cho's cover with Cammy here is just a callback to the "Spider-Gwen cover controversy" he caused in 2015, and that has nothing to do with Street Fighter in general.--109.228.170.122 (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)