Talk:Stride & Prejudice/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

doing Look for a review at the end of this weekend. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 01:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC) -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:27, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Content :
 * No apparent issues with stability and neutrality (4,5)
 * There is a clarification needed tag that needs to be addressed.
 * The reception section needs work. Right now it's just a laundry list of "Person X from Publication Y said Z" rather than synthesizing those critic opinions into something cohesive.
 * I think the gameplay section could use a little more fleshing out. It's not made explicit that Elizabeth is running along the text, and until I dug into the sources I didn't really know that the running is automatic.
 * Images: :
 * File:Stride and Prejudice.png has an improper fair use rationale; it's talking about the logo of the game but the logo is probably public domain as simple text, you have to justify using the splash screen/promo art/what have you.
 * References: :
 * The big question to me is whether this topic at 650 words including the lead is broad enough for GA status. I'm inclined to think it's not at present; given that length isn't a concern there's more detail that could be added.
 * A quick search for sources brought up on the first page of Google results, and that's not checking News, Scholar, Books, or any library databases. I normally wouldn't think an exhaustive perusal of available sources is needed, but considering how short the article is I think you need proportionately more.
 * A quick search for sources brought up on the first page of Google results, and that's not checking News, Scholar, Books, or any library databases. I normally wouldn't think an exhaustive perusal of available sources is needed, but considering how short the article is I think you need proportionately more.
 * Will get to these soon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm gonna withdraw the GA for now, use what you said to help improve the article for a possible renomination. Thanks for the suggestions, it's much appreciated. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 17:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, good luck. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 19:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)