Talk:Strip Me/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 09:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * You need to get a third party to check the copy. In the second sentence alone, there are glaring mistakes: "Originally due for released on 9 November 2010 but was pushed back to 7 December 2010. It is the second album that Bedingfield has released exclusively in the Canada and the United States, following in the footsteps of Pocketful of Sunshine." There are also punctuation errors throughout.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Article is properly referenced and no WP:OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Article covers major aspects and is focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article complies to WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: The prose requires some looking into for grammatical and punctuation errors. I suggest a third-eye have a look at this. Please drop me a quick note on my talk page when this has been completed. – SMasters (talk) 09:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Now that the writing has been fixed, I am confident that the article meets all the requirements for a GA and am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 13:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: