Talk:Stripped (Christina Aguilera album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 20:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

This is one of my all-time favorite albums and most played on my iPod. I'll do this review.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 20:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ha, me too! It's one my favorite albums &mdash; HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that you tagged this with under construction @ 10:52, 18 August 2013. Very odd for a GAN to have such a tag. Stability is one of the WP:WIAGA criteria. I will get back to this and reassess what kind of changes you are making.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Please resolve the disambiguation link issue from the tool box on the right. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 06:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Please resolve the two external link issues in the tool box on the right. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:00, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The EL tool seems to be down right now.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:07, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I am not a reg at WP:ALBUMs, but should the things at List of awards and nominations received by Christina Aguilera from this album be in a table in this article?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It's not necessary, but if you want, I'll add the table of awards and nominations &mdash; HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I think they should be included unless there is some policy against it.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:48, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * WP:LEAD
 * discuss about --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * the top five charts of ->the top five of charts in --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * became Aguilera's top-ten hit in several regions - is a word missing first or something. Otherwise change Aguilera to a .--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:05, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it to "became Aguilera's third top-ten hit worldwide from Stripped". What do you think? &mdash; HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Background
 * "the genre's upward financial trend" s/b something like "the genre's financial lure" --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * "Following the event" - What event do you mean "Following the managerial shakeup"? -TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; HĐ (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Recording
 * Did Aguilera really date that Jorge Santos? --TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, according to several books and sources
 * But it seems he died 40 years before she was born.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it. Actually that Jorge Santos was one of her dancers, not Santos Jorge that you mentioned &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * When you use a linked full name. Subsequent uses do not need the full name (e.g., Linda Perry and Scott Storch).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/WP:FOUR/WP:CHICAGO/WP:WAWARD) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
 * --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've done it. Please check again. &mdash; Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * See WP:LASTNAME.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * How about now? &mdash; Simon (talk) 03:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The first name I checked appears in the prose four times in full (three of them linked).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Is it okay now? &mdash; Simon (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Is it okay now? &mdash; Simon (talk) 04:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Songs
 * Does "out-Whitney" mean that she sang in Whitney's style in a manner that rivaled Whitney? --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a quote. &mdash; HĐ (talk) 01:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You must contextualize the quote.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Because "out-Whitney" is very misleading, so I've removed it. &mdash; Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Singles and other charted songs
 * What is meant by the phrase "life circle of moths."? --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * How unusual is it not to talk about songs being certified? I think something like "managed chart success in several countries" should be followed by "and was certified gold in the United States and Australia".


 * Do we know why DIrrty was certified in so many more countries than Beautiful, even though the latter was number one in so many more countries. --04:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Music certifications are based on sales, not chart positions. &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Live performances
 * Don't assume the reader knows what chaps are. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Touring
 * US$ goes before the number. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * If 30 Mil was 16th, what was 75 mil? --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅, per the source from PopEater is not so reliable &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Reviews
 * The Allmusic review is so close to a direct quote that you should either quote it exactly or paraphrase. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * For a 55 metacritic rating, I thought nearly half of the comments might be positive. That is not the case. Am I mistaken? --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * In the source it says "Mixed or average" &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Some citations are missing parameters. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Images
 * File:Alicia Keys 2011.jpg, File:Dirrty.jpg and File:Stripped Tour CH - cropped.jpg all need . --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think so because they're famous people, and their images are on the web everyday. &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Because they are famous is precisely why the tag is needed.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it's unnecessary, per images for other music FAs such as "Cry Me a River (Justin Timberlake song)" or recently, "Love the Way You Lie"? &mdash; Simon (talk) 10:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't rely on logic similar to WP:OTHERSTUFF. Examine these files and consider whether the tags are useful. I feel they are. You are free to find an image reviewer who says otherwise.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, ✅ &mdash; Simon (talk) 03:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * WP:CAPTIONs
 * The main image needs a caption. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Per Infobox album it isn't necessary


 * The final image has a caption that ends in a period indicating that it is a full sentence when this is not the case. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It's a full sentence then. What do you mean? &mdash; HĐ (talk) 04:58, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Performed would be a proper verb for the CAPTION. However, performing is not a verb.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; Simon (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This article is now on hold. I will monitor its progress and reevaluate in 7 days. I should note that the recent progress has been slow. I apologize if that is in any way due to my slow review.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have just PASSed this article.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh WoW! Thanks a bunch! &mdash; Simon (talk) 09:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)