Talk:Stuart Campbell (blogger)

Wired
Not sure which Wired the quote comes from. I would guess the UK version. Perhaps CaptainCorrecto knows? Hillbillyholiday talk 18:23, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Or even Wired (website)? But I think he may have said "Goodbye Pork Pie Hat", alas. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Sensible Golf?
... is mentioned here Is this reliable/ notable? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

No, I think the Reverend himself would remove it if he saw that there. It has been a bone of contention since he was credited prominently on the game, which he wasn't too keen on. I'm not too sure on the author of this quote, and its not too reliable itself given the jokey context, but it is either Stu or one of the other AP2 writers:
 * "His first (and, as it turned out, despite, for example, what the credits to Sensible Golf insist in gigantic letters, last; his rapid disillusionment with the lovable eccentrics of Sensi perhaps best illustrated by the adoption of a company fruit machine as the effigy of a particularly unprofessional programmer and the battering of it into tiny non-working bits with a lump hammer)" Hillbillyholiday talk 18:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * (I know a few wiki editors with quite a similar style...) Martinevans123 (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Poppy controversy
In 1993 Amiga Power planned to use a poppy on the cover, as a reference to the featured game Cannon Fodder. After protests (orchestrated?) by Daily Star and others, the intended cover was not used. But comments in that issue from Stuart Campbell reignited the debate. The following is preserved on the AP2 site:


 * The Daily Star POPPY GAME INSULT TO OUR WAR DEAD Exclusive by Jonathan Guy 26/10/93
 * War veterans have slammed as "monstrous" a decision to use a Remembrance Day poppy to illustrate a new computer game... called Cannon Fodder. The game, tipped to be the year's biggest seller, will make its debut at a show in London's Olympia from November 11 to 14 - Remembrance Sunday.  Manufacturers Sensible Software say: "War has never been so much fun."  The distinctive poppy symbol is featured on the game and on the front page of leading computer magazine AMIGA POWER, out on Armistice Day.  British Legion chiefs and MPs have branded the use of the poppy as appalling.  Royal British Legion spokesman Dennis York said: "This will offend millions at a time when they remember loved ones who gave their lives in war."  Liberal Democrat MP Menzies Campbell stormed: "It is monstrous that the poppy should be used in such a way."  Viscount Montgomery of Alamein, son of Britain's great field marshall said: "It is very unfortunate that anyone should see fit to detract from the poppy's place as a symbol of remembrance."  But a spokesman for Virgin Interactive Entertainment, which is marketing the game, said: "The poppy is there to remind consumers war is no joke."


 * The Daily Star THE STAR SAYS Editorial 26/10/93
 * SHAMEFUL The poppy is a sacred reminder of the men and women who gave their lives in two world wars.  How sickening to see it being abused to sell a savage computer game.  The distributors say the poppy is there "to remind the customer that war is no joke."  That's just publicity writer's hypocrisy. Computer game designers compete to glorify war and viciousness.  How dare they use the poppy to turn truth on its head.  Make sure you don't buy this shameful game.


 * AP32's Stuart Would Just Like To Say: "Old soldiers? I wish them all dead." [—Stuart Campbell]


 * The Daily Star POPPY ROW MAG INSULTS OLD SOLDIERS Exclusive by Chris McCashin 23/11/93
 * Britain's ex-servicemen are up in arms after a magazine boss declared he would like to see all old soldiers dead. Fury erupted when the Daily Star revealed that, just days before Remembrance Sunday, AMIGA POWER used a red poppy on the front page to illustrate a computer game called Cannon Fodder.  The magazine changed its sick cover after a storm of protest.  But acting editor Stuart Campbell said in an editorial: "Stuart would just like to say, 'Old soldiers? I wish them all dead.'"  Confronted by the Daily Star at his office in Bath, spotty, Scots-born Campbell, 26, said: "It may have been insensitive, but aren't I entitled to an opinion any more?"  The revamped December issue of AMIGA POWER - circulation 54,000 copies a month - also insults the Royal British Legion by labelling them "conscientious objectors" because of their outspoken anger at the abuse of the red poppy.  Enraged Royal British Legion spokesman Dennis York stormed: "Good God. It leaves you speechless. If it was not for the old soldiers who stood up during the wars he might not be alive." AMIGA POWER publishing director Greg Ingham admitted that including Campbell's comment in the magazine was "a regrettable mistake".  He said: "I would like to apologise to the Royal British Legion and anyone else who was offended."

Hillbillyholiday talk 23:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


 * WP:BLPSOURCES rules out using these sources on an article on a living person. --John (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * But now we know that he was aged 26 in 1993 and thus about 46 now..? and that we was spotty!! Despicable. (And only an idiot would have an office in the bath.) Martinevans123 (talk) 12:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Don't expect any of these are quite good enough, (damn these modern net-heads, someone needs to write a BOOK) but I'll keep hunting.. Hillbillyholiday talk 17:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Stu's 'flaming' comment in AP — Click on the image at the bottom left of the screen, (the image labelled 004), and Campbell's comment can just be seen at the bottom left of the page. (Just spotted above the quote, "someone" has given a credit to Adolf Hitler for 'book burning':-)
 * The 'poppy business' has a sourced section here on WP already here but I suppose the Star quotes are okay there as its just a game, but not in a BLP?
 * A PC Magazine mentions the fuss here..
 * Amiga History Guide (a huge site) mentions it as well: Court injunctions were taken out against the magazine by the Mary Whitehouse Committee who attempted to force the publishers' (Future Publishing & Sensible Software) to withdraw Amiga Power issue 32 and Cannon Fodder from sale. The story gained outside coverage, appearing in an edition of the UK-based 'Daily Star' newspaper. The 'newspaper' used the story to reiterate their coverage of video game violence and made several unflattering comments about Stuart Campbell.

AP2 as a source
I think AP2 is a reliable enough publication to be used here. Anyone have an opinion on this? They were famous in the games business for not kowtowing to the usual industry pressures, and a good example of their adhering to some self-imposed rules on accuracy can be seen here (and elsewhere throughout the site) Basically, they went back after the magazine had folded (and the Amiga was all but dead) to examine and try to explain every instance where they made a mistake in the review process. They found three bad ones and put themselves on show-trial(!) concluding: ''Can be no apologies deep enough to excuse these three acts of criminal deception. Jonathan must have been mad, and we were stupid not to stop him. We are all culpable. In fact, it's a good job we were all brutally slain in AP65. It's no more than we deserved.'' I mean, have you heard of a magazine act anything like that? Hillbillyholiday talk 17:17, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

I've found the 'poppy' AP issue in question. And a quite a few others.


 * AP32 (shows a scan of the first Star piece and editorial): We had originally intended to use a...poppy on the cover of this issue of the magazine, but in the light of these developments, we've decided to go for a screenshot of the game itself. (p. 11 Dave Green / Linda Barker)
 * AP32: STUART WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY: 'Old soldiers? I wish them all dead.' (p.4 Stuart Campbell)

Hillbillyholiday talk 19:08, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * AP35 (A reader comments, not relevant but quite funny): Nuts to the Daily Star! It will be a sad day indeed when we're all reduced to playing politically correct New-age flower arranging games. (p.83 Steven Bosanko)

Creative and inventive prose
I mentioned in the lede, famed for his controversial writing and inventive use of prose in his often scathing reviews.  I might have to shift inventive part. I have plenty examples of the scathing though! He also used concept reviews occasionally (e.g. the review Kick Off '96, written in the style of a courtroom drama in which the magazine is charged with murdering the Amiga by the four cyclists of the apocalypse ( AP65 pp. 18-21)

Another thing he was known for was his use of capitals (e.g NO! BURN IT! BURN IT AND SMASH IT! DESTROY IT! NOW! p.42 AP35), words like natch and 'amusing' characters, including "Uncle Joe Stalin" — who made occasional editorial comments in an attempt to erase Stuart Campbell from history — and "Morrissey-on-a-stick" (from the AP lexicon). Whether he was famed for creativity and/or inventiveness is open to debate though. Hillbillyholiday talk 19:53, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Some examples from AP

 * Since I've started working for Amiga Power, I've had lots of abuse from various quarters. Readers, rival journalists, complete strangers in the street, my own parents, they've all had a pop. It's all water off a duck's back of course – I'm from Scotland.
 * [Campbell also compares the game to..] Having electrodes attached to your genitals and being flogged senseless with a knotted rope.
 * International Rugby Challenge review (AP26 pp.30, 32)


 * If you're a boy and you don't like football then there's something wrong with you, so nyah boo sucks.
 * Soccer Kid review (AP29 p.28)


 * Bloody software houses, I bloody hate 'em, You know when this preview copy…arrived in our office? I’ll tell you – one bloody day before deadline, that’s when.
 * Micro Machines preview {AP29 p.25)


 * Fish! Stirling Albion! 32-piece dinner service! Double decker bus! Centipedes! (Snip! I don’t think the 'wacky surrealist' approach is going to get you out of it this time, either. Have another go. – Ed)
 * Rampart (AP21 p.43)


 * AND THE SCOTS HAVE REALLY GOT THE PSEUDO-RUSSIAN LOSERS ON THE RACK NOW! A CROSS, A GOAL!
 * Sensible Soccer 92/93 Season preview (AP21 p.78, with excited use of CAPS throughout review)


 * Honestly, what a lump of crap. It looks absolutely awful, it plays like a dead horse, and it smells rather worse.
 * Joe & Mac Caveman Ninja review (AP22 p.69)


 * ..some groovy touches to take your mind off the chunktabulous graphics.
 * Action Fighter review (AP22 p.80)


 * Let's face it, it's a crap idea, it's a crap coin-op, and it's a crap 'weedyitis' conversion too. Yeuch, basically.
 * Cyberball review (AP22 p.81)


 * I'm getting bored of saying average now. This game is completely, um, candlestick.
 * Last Duel review (AP22 p.83)


 * An open-and-shut case of tealeafery, but the court acquits the game on the grounds that it turns a really rather tedious orc-slashing affair into a bit of a tongue-in-cheek rock'n'roll larf, guv'nor.
 * Motorhead review (AP22 p.96)


 * I'd rather spend the rest of my life locked in a room with Andi Peters and all the presenters of the Disney Club than play it again.
 * Edd the Duck 2 review (AP26 p.73)


 * Some of the levels are real ("Melon farmers" — Ed), with some real ("Bus stops" — Ed) of enemy fortifications making your life incredibly hard. Many was the time I yelled ("Flaming heck" — Ed) and ("Pinched" — Ed) the wall beside my desk...I hate the sons of ("Ladies" — Ed).
 * Apocalypse review (AP37 p.38)

AP on Stuart Campbell

 * We were considering giving away free packets of paper hankies this month, such is the sense of tragedy hanging over us. You see, Stuart's left. (We'll even miss his music. Although, actually…)
 * "AP True stories: Stuart Campbell 1991 – 1994" (AP40 p.11)


 * Some Scottish bloke called Stuart Campbell is using a lifetime of extensive games knowledge to make sure that the...levels are funky, playable and extremely hard. He apparently used to work for ("McDonalds" – Uncle Joe Stalin) before he started at Sensible Software.
 * "Rita, Sue and Cannon Fodder 2" (AP40 p.22) – Cam Winstanley

Hillbillyholiday talk 23:57, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

GibberGnat
To one not in the thick of things, what is 'cybernat' supposed to mean? Someone is being so clever they are simply unintelligible... Shenme (talk) 00:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Try reading the article. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 00:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Vanity article.
This article reads like a vanity article. Lots of statements like- he has influenced generations of writers,and also using the words he or him,instead of using the last name Campbell.--98.87.171.203 (talk) 19:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Attack article
This article reads like an attack article. Lots of statements like -'''A lot of people hate him...Despicable [and] universally hated by the games industry...He has been variously described as "The most feared software hatchet man in the business", and as: "Videogames journalism's answer to Al-Qaeda." ''' -- Hillbillyholiday talk 19:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

"The Reverend"
The article begins by referring to the subject as Rev. Stuart Campbell, but no where in the article is reason for this style of address given. Is he a member of the clergy, is it a nickname, or does he have an unusual first name? Either way I think the article would be improved by some explanation. I see him referred to as Reverend Stuart Campbell elsewhere for instance the Wings Over Scotland about page.

I just noticed that reference is made to the style of address, tucked away in the Wings Over Scotland section of the article:
 * Campbell claimed that while he is a Reverend, he does not talk about his religion as it has "nothing to do with politics"

Which to me at least just raises more questions about why he refers to himself as Reverend. But if he doesn't talk about it then I suspect finding a source for an explanation of the style of address will be difficult.

86.168.68.76 (talk) 15:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

yep, I deleted the Rev title which was reverted sharpish by Hillbillyholiday81 on the dubious grounds that the subject himself identified as a Rev. Doesn't really matter what he self-identifies as without a reliable source. I suspect the title is a novelty one, such as can be ordered over the internet from the Universal Life Church, for example. There is no evidence of legitimate ordination. But whatever. MrLukeDevlin (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Campbell identifies as "Rev.", and does so in this podcast (the one cited in the text). Also check his twitter profile: -- Hillbillyholiday talk 23:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter what he self-identifies as: we need another reliable source for his alleged ordination. If he self-identified as 'Dr' or 'Sir' on the basis of nothing but what he said himself, it would not be acceptable either. Podcasts and twitter profiles are not acceptable as reliable sources for an exceptional claim of this kind. See WP:SPS WP:ABOUTSELF WP:TWITTER . What we would need is a citation from a church or another organisation or source that verified his claim. In the absence of this, the endorsement of the subject's claim about his own title means the page is low-quality. MrLukeDevlin (talk) 13:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should ask Dr Dre for his medical qualifications as well? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 18:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * very droll. In the absence of any serious engagement with what a reliable source is, and without any desire for a revert war, I'm out of here. Page is all yours: enjoy. MrLukeDevlin (talk) 00:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Wings’ founder, the Rev Stuart Campbell, has the ambition to create a Daily Record for the Yes campaign.
 * Luke, the newspaper source provided above (again, in the text) is surely good enough, no? -- Hillbillyholiday talk 00:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I suspect that the newspaper source given is simply repeating the self-identification rather than providing a source for it. MrLukeDevlin (talk) 02:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Quite possibly. I should add that "Rev Stu" is well aware of this article's existence (the previous version got deleted at his own request. See the previous AfD discussion), and as far as I know, he hasn't raised any objections. -- Hillbillyholiday talk 03:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I am unsure why people insist on reinserting "Rev" before Campbell's name, when there is no compelling evidence he is any form of clergyman. The fact he refers to himself as "The Reverend" is not sufficient. If such a claim is true then there should be ample evidence available, from appropriate sources. Besides, even if he is a Reverend, no other clergymen appear to have the prefix "Rev" in their lead, including, for example, The Archbishop of Canterbury. Atshal (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Anna Lertreader will be able to say whether he is a real reverend. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joeygrimlock (talk • contribs) 14:51, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Wings over Scotland visitor stats
Is this really necessary? There are a few problems with it that I can see. First, it's entirely self-reported and therefore not particularly reliable. Saying "the site reported that they had x amount of hits" adds a degree of legitimacy to it that shouldn't really apply. Second, this doesn't seem to be common practice for other articles and largely seems to be aimed at determining significance (even though 50,000 visitors isn't actually that much for a semi-popular blog). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.143.82.199 (talk) 21:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I've just removed some of that self-reported drivel. Please let me know if I missed any. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

"Game jornalist"?
Is Campbell really principally known as a "game journalist"? Isn't he better known these days as a cybernat? Big Ginger Afro (talk) 23:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Obviously malicious Hillsborough edit
The subject's entry already includes this statement regarding his views on Hillsborough:

"I stand absolutely by the stuff that I've written about Hillsborough"

It is therefore not news and not noteworthy that, when directly questioned by some people on Twitter, he continues to stand by those views. His views are already fully covered by the entry as it stands. Wikipedia is not a journal of ongoing Twitter arguments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Lertreader (talk • contribs) 21:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

2017 Harrassment Arrest
WP:BLP is clear that for relatively unknown people accused of a crime, it should be considered not to include details of arrest. It is also very clear that Stuart Campbell by no means is 'relatively unknown' given his career as a journalist, author, registered campaigner for Scottish independence, and all round social media. Given it has been covered in all the UK mainstream media, I cant see there is a BLP issue to answer here. Only in death does duty end (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stuart Campbell (game journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://uk.advfn.com/stock-market/london/game-GMG/share-price
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150817224629/http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Reverend-Stuart-Campbell-raises-11k-woman-fined/story-27613189-detail/story.html to http://www.westerndailypress.co.uk/Reverend-Stuart-Campbell-raises-11k-woman-fined/story-27613189-detail/story.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017081339/http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/Mars-Bar/story-27609549-detail/story.html to http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/Mars-Bar/story-27609549-detail/story.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

World of Stuart
This article includes quite many references to World of Stuart at http://worldofstuart.excellentcontent.com. However, the page no longer works. Should the references be removed or marked with "dead link"? J I P &#124; Talk 13:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Apparently this no longer applies, the page is back online. J I P  &#124; Talk 14:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

The new section
I've tagged the new "Anti-transgender activism" section as POV. First is the section heading, which is from one perspective and thus not neutral. Second, the sources given don't really support "opposition to transgender rights", and even if we found sources stating that directly, we could probably also find sources stating something different about his views on the matter, so we shouldn't present it in Wikipedia's voice. The long facebook entry makes no sense without stating what the bill was about, and including it here looks WP:UNDUE if all we have is his own facebook posting as a source. EddieHugh (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Agreed. He has stated many many times that he backs transgender people having the same rights as everyone else, which they already do. Anna Lertreader (talk) 20:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I have changed the section heading to the more neutral "Views on transgender rights". Mr Minderbinder (talk) 08:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)