Talk:Stucky (fandom)/GA1

GA review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bobamnertiopsis (talk · contribs) 17:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this one! I think I tidied the references on this one a while ago when it was up for DYK but haven't done any substantive editing to it other than that. Excited to dive in! —Collint c 17:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

This article is in great shape and a lot of work has clearly been put into it.
 * 1a: Prose is easy to read and does an excellent job combining sources in a natural way. There are two places I'd like clarifications:
 * There are several instances where it's unclear what type of work (book, comic book, film, etc.) is being referenced; would you mind specifying? (I'm looking at Captain America: White and Black Widow in the Response section, and Gay New York in Analysis and impact but there may be a few other instances where it's ambiguous.)
 * In #GiveCaptainAmericaABoyfriend, it's not immediately obvious that Marvel is a Disney-owned property; would you mind specifying this either with a note or in the text somehow?


 * 1b: Great lead summary! All other required MoS elements complied with.
 * 2a: Strong reflist with consistent ref style.
 * 2b: Much higher than GA-standard attribution. Great work. Tumblr statistics come from Tumblr proper and AO3 source directly sources an AO3 statistic so no qualms with those.
 * 2c: No original research concerns.
 * 2d: Direct quotation appears to be solely quoted and attributed, no other close paraphrasing/copyvio concerns noted.
 * 3a: Sufficiently broad.
 * 3b: The only concern I have here is the inclusion of the template which does not add meaningful information to the article not already covered by the preceding sentence explaining that the user made that tweet. Everything else is appropriately focused.
 * 4: No neutrality issues.
 * 5: Stable.
 * 6a: File:Gwenpool Stucky Panel.png is FU and appropriately tagged. Evans and Stan images are freely licensed and attributed on their pages.
 * 6b: Pics definitely relevant! I appreciate there being a source referencing the Gwenpool panels to justify their inclusion in the article.

All in all, this is very close to GA status and just needs a few touches to get there. Thanks for your patience waiting for this review. I'll give you a week although feel free to ping me whenever! Kindly —Collint c 18:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for your review. Issues have been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks good! This is a Good Article! —Collint c 23:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)