Talk:Student protest

Semantic and etymological problems
For me as a non-native speaker it would be great to clarify the differences between student strike, student boycott, student protest, Student demonstration.

First of all, the protests or demonstrations I attended and organized in Europe had nothing to do with a boycott because many people didn't had to go to school that day or at that particular time. It was just a form of expressing dissatisfaction on the streets and mainly raising media awareness. That's why I don't understand why either the word student strike or boycott could relatively be advantageous. The real pressure lies in our presence outside to put pressure on the government and institutions by

university bureaus and many more places that could paralyze the daily business
 * marching on the streets with many people and media awareness
 * occupying administrative buildings or strategic political places e.g. highways, local government buildings or offices,
 * disrupting public political speeches of important politicians
 * making the involved political party(ies) widely unpopular by expressing our concerns to the public--190.47.46.208 (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

German translation
It would be a big gain for everybody if somebody could translate the German "student protest" page even if only partially into English. There is a lot of historic information that could be interesting and important to English speaking countries and cultures that have people who understand English. A lot of information is not available to people because of such language barriers.78.94.60.112 (talk) 18:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Propose merge from Student strike
I think the article Student strike should be merged into the article Student protest because it is just a form of student protest. --MTLskyline (talk) 14:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I have two problems with the article, Student strike. First, students cannot go on "strike". They are not employees, and are not withholding services. They can boycott classes, yes, but this is not the same thing as a strike. Second, boycotting class is effectively a form of student protest. I would say that it is not an important enough topic to warrant its own article. Sure, the tactic of boycotting class should be mentioned as a form of Student protest, but it should be limited to this article only.--MTLskyline (talk) 02:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:22, 16 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The appelation "student Strike" has a long history and has always been associated with the studient unions. From what I see "Boycott" is really only used from this year as a strategy from the Quebec Liberal Party to avoid having the 2012 Quebec student protests from being protected by the laws about strikes in the province. If you want to add a note saying to the "student strike" article that the terminology is contested by at least the Liberal Party, you can, but it's very far from being widely used. Kamizushi (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The criticism of this term is not limited to just the PLQ. It has also been criticized in editorials in the news media, such as this one at CTV Montreal. Even the Concordia University Part-Time Faculty Association has indicated that they believe the term "strike" is inaccurate, and would rather the term "boycott" be used.--MTLskyline (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Then add a comment about how the term is controversial and for some. Using a terminology only used in Quebec and only by people opposed to student strikes is an obvious violation of the neutrality of point of view. In France, striking is a legally recognized right for students because of the Charte de Grenoble, which give them the same rights as workers.Kamizushi (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I disagree. I think the use of the term "strike" lacks neutrality. The protesting students in Quebec describe their movement as a "strike", however you would be hard pressed to find a specialist in labour relations who agrees with the use of the term. The second link I posted above, from the CUPFA, which supports the students' "strike", indicated that the term strike is inaccurate since only labour unions can legally go on strike. In my opinion, the term "student strike" should be mentioned if France recognizes student class boycotts as a form of strike. However, the concept of a student strike is almost unheard of in English speaking countries. This being the English Wikipedia, I think the topic is only important enough to merit a section in the Student protests article. --MTLskyline (talk) 03:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * How does a hunger strike plays in that? Following your definition it should be called food boycott, no? It's called a student strike because, first, it shares its origin with the syndicalist movement and second, because it's collectively rather than voluntarily, usually because of a decision from the student union. Searching "student strike" on Google gave me 806,000 results with quotes and 91,600,000 without results while "student boycott" only gave me 46,700 results with quotes and 12,000,000 without and "School boycott gave" me 30,000 results with quotes and 52,300,000 results without. From that, we can clearly see that student strike is the most commonly used terminology. Furthermore, even inside this site, "student strikes" is more frequently used. Concerning specifically the merging proposition (which sounds kind of a strange thing to do considering we have a category of articles specifically dedicated to student strikes) correct me if I'm wrong but I'm not aware of any rule saying a bias toward the English speaking culture is an acceptable excuse not to respect the neutrality of point of view.Kamizushi (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A food boycott, I like the ring to that. However people on a hunger strike are not pretending to be labour unions "on strike" in the same way as the students are. Nobody would define a hunger strike as a form of strike action, so why should a boycott be defined that way? I'm curious as to where that term even came from, but that is beside the point here.


 * To address the Google results, I would like to point out that there is no one particular way to refer to what is known as a "student strike". As I already mentioned, the concept is not common in English-speaking regions. The fact that there is no better term for it than a "strike" is probably because this phenomena has not spread into the US, UK, Australia, or even the rest of Canada. When the British government nearly tripled tuition in 2010, there were protests and riots across the UK, but no "student strike". I admit that the term is commonly used in English Canadian news media, but, again, there is not one single term to replace it, and most articles I've seen use the term boycott as a synonym at the very least. (For the record, "strike" by itself has 744,000,000 results on Google and "boycott" only has 44,000,000 results.) Just because there is a lack of a better term than "student strike", does not mean that we should use this politically charged term and pass it off as neutral/factual. Boycotting class is a form of student protest, nothing more. If it is a legally recognized form of strike action, it can be mentioned, of course, but in most places it is not. Regarding the existence of the category, I am in favour of removing it as well.--MTLskyline (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and requested a Third opinion.--MTLskyline (talk) 03:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

3O respond
I am writing here in respond to 3O request. I never participated in discussion on this talk-page, and never edited neither of articles in question. First, this is not quite 3 opinion, as we already have 3 users here, but i would give you mine anyway. After analyzing both articles, and all your arguments and sources, i would say following: In general, there is not enough material or reasons for those two articles to be apart. Also, there is serious questions about students ability to go on "strike", as explained, and therefor, i would propose to merge those two into Student protest. Also, per sources it looks like "Student strike" term may be controversial, so merge should be done even more. Sure, entire content should be merged, and differences and controversials can be sourced and mentioned in the new/old Student protest. Thats it, i hope that i helped, for anything more, i am here. All best. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 16:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree. After all a strike is a form of protest. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:04, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input. I am in complete agreement with you. There is no reason to have two separate articles about student protests. Boycotting classes is a form of student protest, but then so are occupations of buildings, street demonstrations, wearing little red squares, etc.--MTLskyline (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Crazy alternative idea
Couldn't all the issues discussed be fixed by renaming Student strike to Student boycott? D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  20:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That's if there is sufficient reason to maintain two separate articles. Student boycotts are nothing more than a variety of student protest. In my opinion we should merge them, and remove usage of the term strike to reference a student boycott of class. However, I would be willing to compromise and keep two separate articles, as long as the term boycott is used.--MTLskyline (talk) 22:56, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Merge
Can I go ahead and merge the two articles? Does anyone have any remaining issues with the proposed merger?--MTLskyline (talk) 13:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and merged the articles.--MTLskyline (talk) 15:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Removal of boycott section
Please do not remove the section on the student boycott of class without discussing it here first. Thank you.--MTLskyline (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Undo merge from Student strike
Not only does the section merged from the article have nothing to do in an article listing student protests because it is a section about a mean of protestation (just like "sit-ins" doesn't belong in this article), but it is also biased.

Calling student strikes "boycott of classes" is a strategy established by the Liberal Party of Quebec to delegitimize and trivialize the student movement. Everyone called student strikes "student strikes" before the government used that strategy and made the term "boycott of classes" popular amongst those against the movement.

If students cannot go on "strike" because they are not employees, then using the same logic, people cannot go on "hunger strike" or on "sex strike" either because they are neither employees of their body nor are they withholding services from their spouse. Those should then be called "food boycott" and "sex boycott", which they are not, because they are not boycotts. Striking is a concept and that concept applies to "student strikes", much more than "boycott" does (see the appropriate Wikipedia articles).

It is also nonsense to call this a boycott just because the government does not legally recognize the movement as a strike. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Canada or Quebec law book. Following the same logic, the page about "civil disobedience" should not exist either because the governments of Quebec and Canada do not legally recognize it.

Also, since when are media outlets authorities on anything? Media can be biased and they are. What the medias have to say about the legitimacy of calling student strikes "student strikes" is irrelevant since they are themselves biased and are often employed to feed that bias.

Student strikes already have a name and that name is "student strikes". They have always been called "student strikes" (as the links to articles about other student strikes in history show). I'm not a Wikipedia buff, but I am pretty sure it does against the rule that says that the commonly used term should be used.

The merge should be reversed because this article is not about means of protestation and renaming "student strikes" to "boycott of classes" is very inaccurate.

I see in the edits and interventions of user MTLSkyline in the talk page of this and other related articles as an attempt to impose political bias and opinions as fact.

It is ridiculous that such blatantly biased edits even have to be discussed.70.40.168.59 (talk) 00:34, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree. The article should be unmerged and/or the relevant section deleted. It's looks like an attempt to reinvent the wheel to pass a political bias as fact. This is wrong. It is using, and my that I mean "purposefully using", semantics in the same twisted way that the government did to delegitimize the student movement, to twist things to their advantage. The use of the word "boycott" or "boycott of classes" is biased and participating to the bias. As strike is a strike. Everyone knows what a student strike is. No need to reinvent the wheel by using "boycott" unless you want to add a connotation to it. "Student strikes" yields 241,000,000 results on google, while "class boycott" yields 16,500,000 results.
 * I want to draw your attention to the irony of this : "In the West, boycott of class date to the early days of universities in the Middle Ages, with one of the earliest and most significant being the University of Paris strike of 1229" Calling it a "boycott of class" then linking to an article titled "University of Paris STRIKE". MTLSkyline: Are you going to change all the articles and rewrite history to call it a boycott of class? This is absurd. It is also absurd that I tried to link "strike" in "A common tactic of student protest is to go on school strike." to an appropriate article, but that when looking at the strike disambiguation page, the link I have found that would have been the most appropriate was a link to this article. Another argument as to why student protests and student strike should be separate articles. Student strikes are a standalone and legitimate mean of protest, just like general strikes, culture strikes, hunger strikes, prison strikes and rent strikes. Someone is trying hard to twist the facts and make the articles biased. Anyway. I edited the article to replace "boycott of class" with "student strikes" --69.9.85.190 (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I agree that there's some sort of political bent here on using a proper and logical term. Boycott or protest is the proper term.  The teachers, who provide the labor, can strike.  The students, who consume, the service, can boycott.  Just because the students want to adopt what they perceive as more heroic (and justified) pose from labor movement does not change the relationship between providers and takers of a service.  Would you feel there is an issue calling the Montgomery Bus Boycott a "boycott"?  Why was that not a strike? Class boycott is also the proper term.Mattnad (talk) 17:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with Mattnad. The fact is that the term "student strike" is a non-neutral term as the students are receiving a service not providing one. --MTLskyline (talk) 04:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Both "student strike" and "boycott of classes" are non-neutral terms but a student strike carry much less bias than a boycott of classes. Act 78 was drafted, and passed, in an attempt to put an end to a student STRIKE; special laws aren't passed to stop a boycott. Act 78 was the very recognition by the Quebec Liberal Party, albeit implicit, that the 2012 Quebec student strike was actually a strike.--Xiaoshan Math (talk) 02:58, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * A boycott of class is a neutral term because it accurately defines the situation. Refusing to attend class is a boycott, since the students are receiving a service. If the professors were not to show up to work, it would be a strike, because they would be withholding a service. Students are attempting to mimic the traits of a strike, but the fact remains that they are legally unable to "strike". Regarding Bill 78, it is meant to quell the street protests and to prevent protesting students from enforcing their boycott on non-protesting students. It doesn't necessarily legitimize the use of the term "strike".--MTLskyline (talk) 03:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it a good compromise to keep a few lines about boycott of classes, worded as such, on the boycott page while the content on that page could be worded as a student strike with a few lines about how this terminology is criticized? Article 1 of the Charter of Grenoble, which forms the basis of French, and to a lesser extent, Belgian and Quebecer, student unionism, explicitly defines a student as an intellectual worker.--Xiaoshan Math (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure I follow that "Boycott" is a loaded term. Strike is more POV since it's a misnomer and my impression is that people use that term to reposition the protest as something different from not showing up for class.  Can you explain how "boycott" is somehow wrong for what the students are doing, and how that's POV?  What are the criticisms of Boycott?  I find it hard to believe that somehow the Montgomery Bus Boycott somehow diminishes what happened there.  Seriously.  These students have nothing on the brave people in Alabama whose lives were threatened.  And somehow "Boycott" has bias, according to you?  As for the Student Unions describing themselves as "intellectual workers", that's fine for them.  This is not a Student Union propoganda document.  Mattnad (talk) 16:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Just because a few people dispute the use of the term does not make "student strike" a biased term. Appropriate information on such disputes can and should be included in the article itself.  However, because the phrase "student strike" is most widely used, it should be the title.  See WP:FRINGE for more information. Randomizer3 (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Dead links
Two (of the three) external links are dead.Xx236 (talk) 07:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

student suicide as student protest
I reverted this. Reasons: 1) technical - WP:LEAD should not contain new content, but a summary of what's in the main body, which did not mention this 2) technical again - unreferenced. Of course 1) and 2) can be fixed in 5 minutes. But now, 3) while student suicide (self-immolation...) can be seen as extreme student activism, we should not confuse student activism with student protest, just like student strike, merged here, is a separate concept (that however might have lacked notability and was merged here). The are related, but student strike is just one of repertoires of contention used by students, just like sit-ins, or self-immolation. Student protest is somewhat of an ambiguous term, which is why I prefer campus protest, because campus makes it clear we are talking about various activism physically located at the campus. Also, as noted by sources, those protest may include faculty members too, so the name student protest can be misleading. Now, student activism is wider, and not limited to just campus itself; it also includes topics such as student organizations, organizers, etc. So to go back to the reasons for reverting: if a student self-immolates himself at a public plaza, it's not a "campus protest". It's a "protest by a student", but we cannot even be sure it's part of "student activism", unless we define the latter as "any activism involving a student". In either case, this article, which IMHO should be renamed to "campus protest", should focus on "activism on campus", which is different from "activism by students". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 25 April 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Consensus not to move the article at this time, but participants are encourgaed to help develop the scope of this article and student activism and/or consider a merge in the future &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:51, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Student protest → Campus protest – The term "student protest" is more ambiguous and can be confused with "student activism", i.e. protests by students. The term campus protest, used in some sources, is more clear as relating to "activism/protests on campus", which can a) include faculty and b) is limited to campus itself. When students join demonstrations outside campus, it's no longer student/campus protest, but a wider type of social movement activity involving [student activism[]]. For example, 2014 Hong Kong class boycott campaign was a campus protest that eventually grew larger and became a 2014 Hong Kong protests. Or in other words, all student/campus protests are example of studenta activism, but not vice versa. And using the term 'campus activism' should prevent people from confusing more narrow term of 'student protests (on campus)' with a larger term of general 'student activism'. Another way to think of it: "protest on campus = campus protest", "student/campus protests/activism, including all forms of protests and activism by students = student activism", and "student protest" = disambig between those two. Oh, and campus activism should be either a redirect to student activism, I've just created it, or another disambig (not a great term, if student activists meet outside campus, its no longer campus activism but still student activism... sigh).Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose Student protest is more general than campus protest. Coming into this article, hijacking the concept, edit-warring, and then proposing a move to a narrower concept, is very rough and unjustifiably crude editing. Dr.   K.  05:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * More general topic is student activism. Either you want to merge this there, or you recognize them as separate phenomena. Please explain to me the difference between student activism and student protest in your understanding. PS. In fact, I think student protest should be a disambig between student activism and campus protest; the term is used imprecisely to refer to both of these concepts. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * What I know is you want to convert this article into "campus protest". You came in, destroyed the stable version of this article, edit-warred, and now you are starting a discussion. This is supposed to be the other way around. Start a discussion, then change the article after you get consensus. This is very rough editing. You also shifted your position. Initially you asked for references, and when I provided them, you shifted to changing the article topic altogether. I don't have time now to ponder these concepts. When I do, I will let you know. But this type of shock editing is not welcome, at least from editors that I thought knew better.  Dr.   K.  05:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The stable version was unreferenced, so per WP:V it was ripe for removal. I have rewritten it using proper sources. If you want to restore any content I removed, with references, go ahead. But you keep confusing student activism with specific instances of it. If you "don't have time now to ponder these concepts", is it too much to ask that you trust me? Incidentally, I am an academic, sociologist, and have studied and published about social movements. There's a slight chance I actually know what I am doing here, you know? WP:AGF, please? PS. And yes, I want to 'convert' this article into "campus protest", you are 100% right. Because the old article was imprecise both in content and in name. I am just trying to remove this ambiguity. The content should be fine, now, we just need to deal with the confusing name. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Easily the commonest name. The proposed title sounds rather American. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * First, have you considered that the common name "student protest" applies to a more generic term student activism? That article is about specific form of student activism, on-campus protests. Otherwise readers will be confused why we have two articles whose names seem to suggest the same concept (student protest and student activism - what's the difference?). Second. I don't think the word campus (unlike college) is particularly American; it's used by Oxford for example or U of Sydney . And non-English countries too (ex. U of Berlin,  or Sorbonne in France . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  07:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The word "campus" is used worldwide to refer to the territory occupied by a university (I work on one in the UK). But the use of "campus" to refer to things to do with universities in general is more of an Americanism. Ironically for your argument, the student activism article begins with the line "Student activism or campus activism..." So I could ask you the same question. What distinguishes these two articles? Essentially both terms can refer to the same thing. Maybe they should be merged or this article should be renamed Student protest at universities or something similar? -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ironically, it was me who added the "or campus activism" to the lead there, following the argument I made in the opening of this RM. I am not opposed to a merge discussion; if the current name is retained it is easy to see how people will be confused (as some IMHO clearly are here already). And TBH, it's not like I have found a source that clearly differentiates between those concepts, through I'll note that there's also faculty/academic staff activism, and the line between it and some 'student activism/protests' can be blurry. The usage of the word student implies the activity is limited to students, which is not always the case (per sources cited in the article here already). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * In all fairness, no form of activism is usually limited to one group of people. "Student" protests of any form usually attract non-students too. That also applies to Student activism. But anything described as a student protest (or campus protest) is likely to be attended by a majority of students. For a start, there are far more of them at universities than there are academic staff and, being younger and more idealistic, they're often far more volatile and attracted to direct action. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose per Necrothesp. The first thing I thought was that the new title sounds too American. Student protest is fine per WP:TITLECHANGES.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 06:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see my reply above. Campus is used in UK, Australia, Germany, France etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: Student protests are often conducted at off-campus locations. —BarrelProof (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Apart from "Student protest" being the COMMONNAME for this article, it is the more general term since it encompasses student protests everywhere, not only confined to campus. This article the way it now stands, including its introduction as it was recently modified by edit-warring, contains POV, OR, and inaccuracies. Dr.   K.  17:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Of course, but in this case they are just part of generic student activism. Either we merge this article there, or we discuss here something that is clearly different. And my overview of the literature suggests that the concept that has separate notability is about student protests on campuses. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Usage of the term student protest
It's an ambiguous term that often is a synonym of student activism. Consider for example: questions, (i) How often do you participate in the student movement? Have you participated in: (2) joining a revolutionary ideology study group, (3) joining a campus stage acting group, (4) entering dissident religious group activity, (5) enrolling in an all-night study group, (6) participating in labor-student solidarity actions, (7) campus demonstration, (8) off-campus protest, (9) occupying campus buildings?" This is very helpful for seeing what student activism composes of. What the concept of "campus protest" here is focused on is (7) and (9) - campus demonstration, protests. This is different from (8), off-campus protest.
 * : "student protests in South Korea". Country-wide, not campus-wide concept, related to items such as student activism in the Gwangju Uprising. Note that his chapter title is student movements. It's also is a concept wider than single-campus protests, currently redirecting to student activism, through IMHO it is independently notable as an organizational type article (a specific form of social movement organization).
 * (full text like usual in Library Genesis if you don't have uni access...). This is an example of the work that doesn't seem to distinguish between the terms student protest, campus protests, and student activism. He only defines protest.
 * See student protest used as a synonym for campus protest here as well
 * this article provides a typology of some student activism. Here's a summarized quote based on their questionaire: "Conceptually, [student] activism is defined in terms of behavioral commitment: participating in a sit-in, protest, demonstration, etc. The scale is based on nine

In either case, it should be clear that the concept of 'student protest' refers to many things and needs to a disambig. Or we just merge this into student activism in general, but I think on-campus protests can be distinctive enough to warrant their own article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Faculty involvement
Consider "faculty protest". This is another name that about as bad as student protest. Faculty can participate in on-campus protest, mingling with students (sources for this are in the article). Clearly, a protest that includes both students and faculty should not be called 'student protest'. There are also faculty-only protests. Some occur on campus (cancelling classes, not filling paperwork), while other can include marches outside campus, and so on. The concept of campus protest can allow for participation by both students and faculty. We may need a separate article on faculty activism, mirroring student activism. But the folly of the name 'student protest' should be clear when we consider that 'student protest' would stop being a student protest as soon as non-students join it... --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that "faculty" is another American term not commonly used in other countries. In most places, a faculty is only a sub-division of a university (as it also is in America), not its academic staff. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Fair point (faculty redirects to academic personnel). --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

POV tag
I added a POV tag because the title of the article and the contents do not match. The article as imposed after the recent edit-war talks about campus protest, while the title is about student protest. The two are not the same. Students have protested on city streets and at legislatures, not only on campus. This has to be fixed immediately. Dr.  K.  19:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Student protest = student activism. We don't need a fork of that article. The only independently notable topic outside of the general student activism, which includes student protests on and off campus, is on-campus protest. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:46, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Please, Piotrus, don't conflate the two issues. It is a different question if student activism = student protest and a different question if you have to come to the existing student protest article and try to convert it to something it is not, i.e. campus protest. Why don't you leave this article alone? Instead of trying to make a sloppy move of student protest to campus protest by edit-warring-fueled copypasting, why don't you go back to campus protest and revert your own edit which made campus protest a redirect to student protest? That would solve a lot of problems. First, you would restore your own campus protest article, so you would not have to come here proposing this counter-intuitive move which has no chance of succeeding. Then the rest of the problems could be solved in an easier way than by the counter-intuitive method you are trying now, which, might I add, is also supported by your rapid-fire edit-warring. Not good, Piotrus, not good. Dr.   K.  19:32, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * What's not good is that you are effectively trying to create two forks of the same topic. I asked you numerous times: what is the difference between student protest, as it existed before my merge, and student activism article? The old version of this article contained a merged text from student strike (, Talk:Student_protest), only partially referenced, and the totally unreferenced, OR lead. I did not remove any referenced content, I just removed unreferenced OR, and expanded this. I guess we can move the current version of the article to campus protests and restore the old junk version here - through the next move, then, would be either a merge, or a simple AfD for what remains here. After which this entry would become either a disambig or a redirect. In other words, the end process you propose above would have exactly the same effect as the RM I propose. So what's your point, really? PS. Since I mentioned the merge, who were active in discussing it few years back. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Since the RM failed and there's an objection to the merge of campus protest to student protest, I propose to revert this article to the pre-merge state. Any thoughts on that? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree. Please feel free to recreate Campus protest. Dr.   K.  06:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

After looking at this again, I think merged single article is better than two forks. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:17, 15 January 2020 (UTC)