Talk:Studio One (company)/Archives/2015

Recent edits
I began reviewing the recent edits by and started seeing that almost all of the sources were just blurbs or brief mentions cobbled together to focus excessively on the most promotional aspects of an acceptable article. I did restore the logo change however; it would be nice if we could get the logo image on a transparent background.

Thank you for reverting, as it was quickly looking like reviewing the edits one-by-one was not a good use of time. CorporateM (Talk) 23:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that, I didn't didn't see your edit, and since it was a revert I didn't get an edit conflict warning, otherwise I would've discussed on talk. The sources were way, way too flimsy, though. Grayfell (talk) 23:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, will revisit the edits one at a time and try to only use full articles. Didn't see these as passing mentions, but no matter. No point in adding something that isn't agreeable! Usterday (talk) 00:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)