Talk:Sturgeon Bay Bridge

Infobox image
Hi! I just found a couple images of this bridge on Flickr, and I wanted to suggest that File:Sturgeon Bay Bridge.jpg be used as the infobox's picture. I didn't change it right now, because the current image in that spot is used on the main page's DYK section, and didn't want to confuse people. Anyways, I added the ones I found, to the images section for right now. Killiondude (talk) 18:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Fine with me (as the page's creator), once it's off the main page. Just switch the current image to the gallery. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 19:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Bridge reconstruction
A friend went down and took some photos of the bridge during construction, if someone wants to add them to the article.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/shadowrunner71/

(Don't ask me who he is - I can't an won't tell you, for obvious reasons) :P

99.165.109.144 (talk) 04:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Sturgeon Bay Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080603044006/http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov:80/projects/sturgeon/ to http://www.dot.wisconsin.gov/projects/sturgeon/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Sturgeon Bay Bridge?
Whoever the idiot is that created this, it's not known or called the "Sturgeon Bay Bridge" - it's called the MICHIGAN STREET BRIDGE! God, I HATE it when people think they know more about something than the locals! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.107.46.102 (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Graph of comparative bridge openings
I am of the opinion that the bridge opening graph should be in the article. The article is small enough for it to fit, and similar graphs and figures have been published for popular interest in off-wiki media. It is not mere esoterica, rather traffic is an economic indicator which people have monitored for some time already.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)