Talk:Stuttering therapy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello. I will be doing the GA review for this article. Here are some suggestions for improvement: That's it for now. The article will remain on hold for seven days for improvements. Nikki 311  00:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As the user above pointed out, the cleanup banner qualifies this article for quickfail. However, I'm in a good mood today, so I'll give you a chance to fix the problem in the " on hold" period. :)
 * "and these have been successful to varying degrees" - grammar - these what?
 * In Goals, you talk about what "others" believe. Are these individuals qualified clinicians or psychologists or some hacks on the street?
 * In the summary of the acronym MIDVAS, the numbering isn't needed.
 * Refs 25 and 26 are the same, so they can be combined.

Comment - If this is considered a serious psychology article (rather than pop psychology), please consider evaluating the reference sources according to Reliable sources (medicine-related articles). Thanks, &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 01:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The seven days are up, and I am failing the article due to lack of progress. Please consider addressing these concerns before renomination. Thanks. Nikki 311  15:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)