Talk:Sub-quorum

(closed following merge)

I do not beleive this page should be merged it too different to be the same

There's too little to say about sub-quorum to have its own article. It should be mentioned at quorum... but first it needs to be verifiable. With a quick Google search, I'm not seeing this meaning of "sub-quorum". It apparently means something in graph theory, and there are a lot of references to "sub-quorum meetings" - that is, informal meetings that are deliberately too small to affect policy. Do you have a source for this use of "sub-quorum"?  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  19:48, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

http://bugs.bham.ac.uk/getinvolved/guild_council/Papers/Papers260106/02aStanding%20Orders%202006.doc

I merged it to quorum. We still need further verification and expansion. The section on sub-quorum is only a couple of sentences long, makes a nice paragraph (but should be expanded). Sub-quorum is a different way of computing quorum for whether business can be transacted, so it will fit there. RJFJR 16:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)