Talk:Sub Rang Society

CSD
would you mind telling me how this doesn't mean G11? Thanks, Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 21:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Because it is not blatant advertising, for example it was passed at AFC, please read WP:CSD Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 * that doesn't answer my question. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 17:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

the article sounds just like it would be written on the website of the subject. This isn't the defining factor, but it does make it feel overly promotional. Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 18:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Because it is not written in an overly-promotional tone. What exactly do you consider to be written in an ovely promotional tone ? Atlantic306 (talk) 17:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ive amended it, but I don't agree that it qualifies for G11. If you consider it to be non-notable then there is prod or AfD available, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2019 (UTC)