Talk:Subarnarekha (film)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus. I've created the proposed title as a redirect, though. Jenks24 (talk) 11:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Subarnarekha (film) → Suvarna Rekha – A picture is worth a thousand words -- Tito Dutta  ✉  07:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose with that rationale; the picture is worth little. What is the story behind the different transliterations?  Is there a problem with the present one?  Dicklyon (talk) 16:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Film censor certificate is part of a film and shows how the creators of film spelled it also what spelling has been registered in Government's database! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  17:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: Per WP:COMMONNAME, this film certificate should be inadmissible evidence. The title should be based on the most common name for a subject, as determined by its prevalence in reliable English-language sources – not based on the name printed on a government-issued or legal document. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:09, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't it be admissible? I don't think it's enough evidence to outweigh other sources, but it certainly seems relevant. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 05:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose —Are there any other sources that write it this way? IMDB etc all seem to write it the way we have it now. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 05:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ya, this spelling has been used too–
 * Visual anthropology in India and its development
 * Mumbai Film Festival, India
 * Complete index to world film
 * There are multiple spellings– 1) Subarnarekha 2) Subarna Rekha 3) Suvarna Rekha 4) Suvarnarekha. In film censor certificate the fourth spelling was used! -- Tito Dutta  ✉  06:07, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I've struck my oppose. ErikHaugen (talk &#124; contribs) 06:36, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Opinion: If we are going to stay here, I suggest to add this spelling too as alternative spelling (eg. "Subarnararekha or Suvarna Rekha......") -- Tito Dutta   ✉  06:12, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Film poster: Okay, I have found a poster of this film which is using the requested spelling. I have uploaded in my GPlus stream, you can see it here -- Tito Dutta  ✉  06:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The post doesn't show it as two words. Dicklyon (talk) 04:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - if there are that many spellings, do need to pick one for the main, but regardless of which, the other spellings should also probably redirect to the main one, no? -— Isarra ༆ 21:18, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.