Talk:Subduction tectonics of the Philippines

What does this mean? This isn't the right answer to my question

Message from Charles
1. The preview image can be a bit bigger so that the audience can grab the key concept more conveniently. 2. The first sentence of the introduction can simply answer the question of "what is the subduction tectonics of the Philippines" 3. More terms bluelinked with the subsections in the wiki page can be added to create more linkage between the precise introduction and the following contents. 4. The images of the cross-sections are exceptionally well as they simply and precisely describe the shear partitioning mechanism and the subduction process.--Charlespsml (talk) 14:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Message from Alex
--Alexnlk (talk) 11:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) I think it is not necessary to mention the author's names when you write the content as the citation has already helped you to do this work.
 * 2) Is there any method to add a citation for GeoMapApp figures?
 * 3) For "Palawan–Central Philippines collision zone", it is possible to describe each collision zones simply (e.g. geology).
 * 4) The content of this page is doing exceptionally well since the contents mostly clear, concise and simple. It is suitable for geology beginners to read and able to develop their geological interest about Philippines tectonics.

Message from Tommy
1. I think it would be great to explain the mechanism leading to northward and southward migration of the trench from Bicol.

2. May I know why continental suturing leads to break-off of plate Y and subsequent subduction of plate Z?

3. You mentioned Philippines is one of the most hazard-prone regions on Earth. It would be great to include a particular geohazard case study to show why it is important to study this subduction system.Makhkugeo (talk) 05:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Comment from Graeme
I would like to see references for the two sections "East-dipping subduction zones" and "West-dipping subduction zones". If references they would then permit an article to get into WP:DYK. ALso for the lead map, please make the writing on the trench labels bigger, some are just readable in the thumbnail, but others are not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Message from Helen
1. It will be better if you could enlarge Fig. 3 so that the readers can read the words and symbols more clearly.

2. Fig. 6 presents a very clear mechanism of the spontaneous initiated subduction but it will be good if the materials on Plate X are annotated.

3. Sub-titles can be added for the different hypotheses of Philippine Trench Formation.HelenHYW (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Comment by Ariel
1. It would be great if the "volcanoes of the Philippines" figure could be simplified into simple outline of the Philippine and triangles representing the volcanoes only.

2. It would be great to add a simple geological map showing the spacial relationship of the components you have mentioned, e.g. the trenches, microcontinental blocks, etc. Hkgeo4869 (talk) 05:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

3.For the subduction initiation mechanism section, the paragraphs could simplified into annotation and caption for the diagrams. Hkgeo4869 (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

3.For the subduction initiation mechanism section, the paragraphs could simplified into annotation and caption for the diagrams. Hkgeo4869 (talk) 06:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Comment from Abraham
Improvement 1

I think the citation should be placed after a full stop or comma. I am not so sure but this is what I saw in other well-developed wiki pages.

Improvement 2

It would be great if the color scheme of the illustration of the shear partitioning mechanism is not that strong.

Improvement 3

The size of the bathymetric profile might be enlarged a bit.

Well done

The overview diagram with the coordinates is very nice. The thickness of the lines is perfect. It looks very clear.

--AMLSIU (talk) 03:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)