Talk:Sublingua/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll review this! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:23, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * review
 * I've reviewed this article and made a few minor copy edits which you are free to change.
 * The changes look excellent. Thanks for the ce and typo fixes. –  VisionHolder  « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I have just one question. Why under "Literature cited" do some of the citations have an "edit" link to edit the citation? (I've never seen this before.)
 * Those citations use the templates cite doi or cite pmid. The templates are useful for standardizing and simplifying references between articles, and since I may be using these same sources for articles like Toothcomb or an upcoming article like Anatomy of lemurs.  –  VisionHolder  « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Otherwise, it is a great, informative little article - just right! MathewTownsend (talk) 22:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I still hope to provide better illustrations soon.  But I figured this was good enough for GA. –  VisionHolder  « talk » 00:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Congratuations! Very nice! MathewTownsend (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)