Talk:Subreption

Older comments
Could someone actually explain this? Why even bother having a page?


 * Seconded. Why is there no definition? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.192.174.243 (talk) 22:37, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

This article does not even attempt to explain what Subreption is
Hello, one and all. I came to this article (probably like most) who found this term mentioned in Kant, desiring an explanation of this concept.

Helpfully, the article informs me that it is a concept from Roman Canon Law, which I was grateful to learn.

Unhelpfully, the article neither explains what its use was in Canon Law, nor at any other point in history, though it has the good sense to point out some places where it has been used (such as Kant.)

Now, since I do not have the least understanding of this term, I cannot (yet) fix this abortion of an encyclopedia article. I will try to return if I can succeed in my quest to understand what "subreption" is; in the meanwhile, is there anyone out there who knows what this is?

To conclude, for any who may be reading: The present article literally does not say what the topic of the article even is, or might be. The article thus fails the most basic requirement for an encyclopedia article. Might there be anyone out there who can clue us all in? Many thanks. (You will note that this problem had already been noted twice in 2009, to no avail. I echo the sentiments of these bygone editors.) 63.143.200.194 (talk) 02:13, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

HELP!
A pithier version of the above: Can someone, anyone who knows what subreption is, or means, please fix this article? The article does not say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.143.200.194 (talk) 02:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)