Talk:Substitute checks in the United States/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Edge3 (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Article looks good in terms of writing style, broadness, neutrality, stability, and image usage. (WP:GACR) I shall now check the sources. --Edge3 (talk) 16:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Sources look ok. It would be nice to have information on people's reactions to the introduction of the substitute check, but perhaps that's more appropriate in the Check 21 Act article. The substitute check article, in my opinion, is ready for GA status. --Edge3 (talk) 17:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

The clearing process is overly complicated. In this scenario, there are three banks involved to create and forward a substitute check. Medium and large institutions don't use two correspondents, so this is also an uncommon example in context of check clearing volume. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.241.223.4 (talk) 16:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)