Talk:Substitute good/Archives/2020

Assessment of Article
The grade for this article should be updated to "C". The article contains substantial information, with appropriate references to that provides validity for the content included. The article is able to provide casual readers with an understanding of the topic with the inclusion of several examples in relation to the theories touched on. However, the article does not meet the six B-Class criteria, in the aspect that certain sections require expansion and that the structure of the article should be improved on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S4561730 ECON3430 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

The article is now at a point where it is sufficient enough to be graded a "C". It provides general knowledge on the topic as well as going in depth with more specific discussions of the topic. Examples are provided to make the concept easier to understand which helps the casual reader have a firmer grasp on the topic. The article is appropriately referenced but more work can be done on it. The importance of the article does not need to be changed as it is already in the appropriate category. S4435978 (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2020 (UTC)