Talk:Subsystem number

Please do not use acronyms without writing them out in the article.

Merge with SCCP
Cannot this page be merged with Signalling Connection Control Part? — Dgtsyb (talk) 01:37, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Jafeluv (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Subsystem number -> Subsystem Number

Per WP:CAPS and WP:TITLE: this is a proper noun referring to the single and specific information element of the international Signalling Connection Control Part standard. It does not refer to general numbers for subsystems. — Dgtsyb (talk) 22:58, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose. As the article itself shows, this is not a proper name. There is not one single number called "Subsystem Number", but several. The very first sentence of the article:
 * "Signalling Connection Control Part (SCCP) subsystem numbers are used to identify applications within network entities which use SCCP signalling."
 * This is supported by material from the first of the two external sources that are cited:
 * "The following globally standardised subsystem numbers have been allocated for use by GSM: ..."
 * Neither WP:CAPS nor WP:TITLE gives support to this RM.
 * N oetica Tea? 00:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose Not a proper name, subsystem number is just a concept. Stick with the MoS - no need for an exception here. Joja  lozzo  02:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose: "SCPP", I suppose, can remain upcased, since it's a protocol. But certainly not "subsystem number". Why would you upcase that? Tony   (talk)  04:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Oppose. There is no unique subsystem number that may be referred to as the Subsystem Number. Nageh (talk) 23:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't support this move. "SCCP subsystem number" seems to be the same as "IP address". --Enric Naval (talk) 21:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.