Talk:Sudan Peace Act

This has nothing to do with Darfur
I just want to note, because I've had to remove it twice now, that this does not belong in the Darfur conflict category. Yes, it's in Sudan, but it's not related to the Darfur conflict. The CPA, South Sudan, First Sudanese Civil War, etc. are all a separate conflict from Darfur. Please stop adding this into an unrelated category. Thanks. ivan 00:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Considering the timing could this maybe fit Category:Second Sudanese Civil War? The second one started in 1983, I believe the September Laws et alia relate to it, and I think this refers to that.--T. Anthony 10:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The article seems to say it is about a response to the Second Sudanese Civil War so I added that category. Hope that's okay.--T. Anthony 10:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

No accusation of Genocide
Firt I want to support UTC for his/her statement, indeed the Darfur crisis arose one year after the act was signed. I got another amendum though: the sudan Peace act entails no accusation of genocide in any way. the United States never blamed the Government of Sudan for commiting genocide in Southsudan, only for commiting genocide in Darfur, Colin Powell said it in September 2004 and Pres. Bush repeated it later, Congress made a declaration with the acucsation in July 2004. couldnt have been part of the Sudan Peace Act as the genocide hadn t happened yet. (Question is whether it is a genocide at all, Professor Mamandi of Columbia University refutes it, cf. Guernica interview with Mamandi ) (hugoline) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugoline82 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)