Talk:Sugar buzz

People who is looking for an explanation about a subject should at least find links to other web sites that could do it. It also could inspire someone else to create original article in Wikipedia.
 * But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of links (WP:NOT). The article has to come first. - Randwicked Alex B 00:28, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * And also if you think this subject is important and encyclopedic, why don't you write at least a short stub, in your own words, then that will be a valuable contribution. 131.111.8.100 00:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I wrote a short stub, but still subject to deletion. Why!? User:ClaudioMB
 * I think at this stage you can remove the tag from the page; it is not perfect, but perhaps not a speedy candidate. 131.111.8.100 00:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This content is duplicated in Sugar. The article as it is is decidedly non-encyclopedic.  Maybe just make it a redirect? -- Vary | Talk 01:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I've redirected it to sugar Thanks --Jaranda wat's sup 02:13, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe that should be redirected to Sugar. User:ClaudioMB 03:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Have a look at WP:R, since redirects of the type #REDIRECT Sugar don't work - I've reverted it to Jaranda's version. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 03:08, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

I think it should be catagorized under the diabetes page. And maybe as a side note in the stoner section. -djsavmarie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.71.21.209 (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)