Talk:Suillus pungens/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Fine job! One nitpick:
 * In Descr., sentence "The surface is smooth but is sometimes streaked with gluten when older." The protein gluten? Rcej (Robert) - talk 05:52, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Myco-jargon for cap slime... clarified. Thanks for copyediting & review! Sasata (talk) 06:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * There are a couple of dablinks- check the link on the right. J Milburn (talk) 13:01, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thanks. Sasata (talk) 14:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Very nice, peeps! Pass :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:06, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Suillus pungens passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: