Talk:Sujud Sahwi

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

One viewpoint expressed
The current viewpoint regarding how sujud qabli and sujud ba'di are divided is based on the view of the Maliki madhhab; the Hanafi and Shafi'i madhhabs both have slightly different views. I also have no idea what the Shia or Ibadhi views would be. This is probably due to simple lack of foresight, sort of like how some people from Pakistan (where most imams are Hanafi) are totally unaware that the rest of the world doesn't consider witr to be fardh, and other such regional differences. The solution might be to remove the subheadings, put everything into one section about the method of performing this, and then just mention the different views (possibly in one paragraph - the differences are small). Possible future improvements could be sections on the history of how such fiqhi views on the topic developed, though obviously this isn't the broadest of topics so ultimate article length might be inherently limited. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Structure
There are separated sections Qabli and Ba'adi with same process explained. Difference should be explained or sections joined as one case. --Obsuser (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)