Talk:Sulabh International

Copy-over from talkpage of new redir SulabhENVIS
The following was on the talkpage of what is now a redirect here. For visibility's sake, I've copied it over to here:
 * Although there is a clear COI/promotional issue going on here, the subject of the article may be notable. I could find eight hits through Google Books and eighteen through Google Scholar. There are also around 7500 google-hits, but that itself doesn't say much and a quick glance told me that most things google finds there are either not independent or not reliable (or both).

I have not yet looked in-depth as to how reliable the hits from Google Books and Google Scholar are and whether they are trivial mentions or in-depth coverage, although a quick glance told me that a fair few are at least independent of the article's subject, but it looks to me like the subject of the article has a fair chance of being notable enough per wikipedia guidelines. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 08:45, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevermind: what is notable is the organization behind it, Sulabh International, and that article already exists, if somewhat outdated. Going to redirect this page to that article. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Some information on SulabhENVIS and on other recent matters should probably be added to this page. Unfortunately, during my check I found that the text on the now-redir was a copy-vio on top of COI, promo and a fair few other issues. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2014 (UTC)