Talk:Sultan Hassan (astrophysicist)

Notability
@Onel5969 Sultan Hassan meets the notability criteria under Notability (people) (1), Notability (people) (2) and (3). In addition, in the context of Africa and Sudan, being awarded a NASA fellowship is not something trivial. Hope you can remove your tag. FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, not enough in-depth coverage to show that he passes WP:GNG, the NASA is impressive, but does not meet notability criteria on its own, and his scholar profile does not mee WP:NSCHOLAR. Please remember that WP:ANYBIO is a guideline which may denote notability, and does not trump WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 Academics meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are NOTABLE! see Notability (people) (2). Do not make your own rules! FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read my above reply.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 WP:GNG A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Are we going in a loop here! The article is well referenced.
 * Sultan easily passes the GNG criteria. It's not very polite to tag pages in the way that you did, you could easily have started a section on the Talk page FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There is no in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Rather than waste time like this on the talk page, simply find that in-depth coverage if he's notable.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:04, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 So NASA now is not a reliable source! good to know!
 * As this is your 2nd time trying to delete something I have built please stop deleting pages that you have no relation to. This ruins the hard work of others on this website. #Racial bias on Wikipedia. -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:06, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 Now you are moving from notability to reliable sources! amazing! -FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, when you add Facebook as a reference... just sayin'.... And didn't move from one to the other, still has the notability tag for you've done nothing to show improvement as to notability. In-depth means in-depth.  Independent means having nothing to do with the person or anything to do with the person.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Onel5969 I am done arguing with you. If NASA reference and the other 9 references are not reliable for you then I think you just being adamant not to admit you are wrong. We are here to learn and you are here to pretend like you own the place. Here is an WP:GNG for you -- FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)