Talk:Sulumbek of Sagopshi/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Geardona (talk · contribs) 19:40, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks @Geardona for starting the review! Regarding 6, I added 2 images, one of which is the only existing image of Sulumbek so most likely there won't be another image. Regarding 3, unfortunately the article is short but that's mostly due to me trying to use as much as reliable sources as possible which are obviously not many and they gave that much information. I mean, I could use few articles from reliable newspaper but I'm not sure if they're considered reliable in this topic (which is historical), what do you think? Btw, there's short articles like Varsken which also became GA nevertheless, so I don't think that this article can't be one. Anyways, I could still try to find more RS and add more information to the article. Best regards, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi!
 * Articles from newspapers could be used as reliable sources, at least with some corroboration between them.
 * In terms of length, try adding some precise descriptions of the robberies he committed.
 * Cheers!
 * Geardona (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello! I added some new information from one of the most reliable Ingush newspaper Serdalo. What do you think? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 22:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Nice work! Geardona (talk) 22:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there any more issues with the article? I most likely won't find any more images because there exists only 1 real image taken of him. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 23:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It is almost there, any images would help, even if they are pictures of a memorial or court record. Geardona (talk) 23:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I added an excerpt from Russian newspaper Russkoe slovo which reported on Sulumbek's arrest. Are 3 images now enough? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yep, most likley Geardona (talk) 00:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Is there any more issues remaining? What's the next step? WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Other GA reviewers need to look over it Geardona (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello @Geardona! I'm not quite sure I understand, who are "other GA reviewers" (and have they looked over the article?) if you're the (only) reviewer currently? WikiEditor123… 22:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * We just need to wait for other random uninvolved people, GA reviewers are not a special class of editor. (Maybe review other articles to reduce the backlog and clear the war for others to review this page.)Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions#Reviewing Geardona (talk) 02:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ Geardona (talk to me?) 12:12, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

NOTE: I copyedited this article, although I am not significantly involved in the article. Rating on a increasing 1-5 scale Criteria:

1 (Well written): 4/5, article is readable, but may benefit from expansion.

2 (verifiable): 5/5 plenty of sources, did a random check and it is verified

3 (Broad in its coverage): 4/5 4 (Neutral): 5/5 Good

5 (Stable): 5/5 Very stable

6 (Illustrated): 4/5