Talk:Sum of two squares theorem

Bold textIs this article not a stub? Jedieaston (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

There is a better article Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares. What is the point of having two articles on the same topic?—회기-로 (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

The page you mention doesn't address the same thing: Here, n isn't prime.--2A01:E35:2E4B:8E70:7001:B302:E99E:4E20 (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The general case follows easily from the prime case. I can‘t imagine this wasn‘t known to Fermat. If this is confirmed by sources, then the article on Fermat‘s Theorem should cover both results.—회기-로 (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

ambiguous
formulation "contains no prime congruent to {\displaystyle 3}3 modulo {\displaystyle 4}4 raised to an odd power" is ambiguous on at least 2 issues ( like, where would be the parenthesis using an algebraic expression ). Please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:2E4B:8E70:7001:B302:E99E:4E20 (talk) 08:23, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

I agree it sounds ambiguous, although the examples section clarifies it. The "raised to an odd power" applies to the prime number. I'll try to re-write it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:445:4380:2410:B4FD:5F35:7946:367A (talk) 01:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Jacobi two-square theorem
I added a section on Jacobi's two-square theorem since I don't think it needs its own article. Wqwt (talk) 06:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That seems reasonable to me. Thanks. JBW (talk) 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)