Talk:Summa Technologiae

My revert
Re: this - While anybody's scholarly review is a valid source of facts about the reviewed work, IMO the judgements are of encyclopedic value only when they come from peers or well recognized scholars in the area. The latter ones must either have a wikipedia article or described as such in RS (and the latter fact must accompany the judgement, so that nobody asks WTF is this Jacek Skrzyszyński to read his judgement). Staszek Lem (talk) 17:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

You wrote Peter Butko is a scholar. Who the heck is he? What makes his opinion on Lem important? Did you try to find out this before reverting me? Butko is Ph.D in physich and biophysics in Slovakia and Hungary. Therefore he has no say in literary criticism. Your revert will reverted as an edit done without due diligence, unless you provide proof that Butko is an expert in literature. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:28, 20 October 2019 (UTC)