Talk:Sumner station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 12:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * Narrow and Traffic streets? So just clarifying, those are the names of the streets? That's weird but okeydokey. Out of curiosity is Narrow street particularly narrow? :)
 * Yes, they are the real names and quite accurate.
 * Why does the redlink 'Red Apple' pipe to ' Red Apple Markets'? Should you remove the piping if that's the actual name of the chain of stores?
 * Removed the red link, but I plan to put the article at "Red Apple Markets" eventually. The company is commonly referred to as "Red Apple", but that title is taken by other articles.
 * "two bicycle racks" - can you give any indication of how many spaces for bikes there are on the rack? I only ask as you're very specific with parking spaces, and this detail consequently highlights the lack of detail regarding the racks
 * Added capacities for the bike racks and lockers.
 * "awarded to Lumpkin General Contractor" - you previously mention a firm was based in Tacoma. Can you let us know where this contractor is based or something relevant about them?
 * Couldn't find any information on the contractor.
 * "were moved to a new facilities" - grammar
 * Fixed.
 * "on city-owned" - I'm a little confused by this. Is this the equivalent of saying "land owned by the city"
 * Added missing word.
 * "adjacent to the station in downtown" - should the word "in" be here? I'm honestly not sure.
 * Removed "in downtown".
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Looks really good. Placing on hold until minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 12:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I've addressed your points above. Thanks for the review.  Sounder Bruce  20:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Passing. :) Freikorp (talk) 23:13, 13 May 2018 (UTC)