Talk:Sun's curious identity

Untitled
Surely we all know Ekhad is not a person - perhaps we should link this to Zeilberger? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.6.168.245 (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

below encyclopedic standard?
Are comments like "sophisticated identity" not completely out of place in an encyclopedia? Also, the sentence "This shows that the identity of Sun is a good example for various advanced tools used to prove combinatorial identities." has, in my opinion, no place in an encyclopedic entry. Any objections to deleting at least that sentence, to give this entry some semblence of serious information? --Alexbar (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)