Talk:Sunbridge Institute

Untitled
This article has no references at all. It is in violation of the arbitration rulings concerning anthroposophy-related articles and has been so for months. If adequate, non-anthroposophical sources are not cited in the next week or so, I will propose it for deletion.DianaW 03:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

A. sources are permitted for non-controversial aspects of a subject. In addition, an organization's self-descriptions are explicitly permitted as sources for factual material in an article on that organization. Hgilbert 11:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * An article cannot rely solely on self-published sources, as this does. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I *am* proposing it, Hgilbert, and you've already had months. The arbitration was back in January and applied to the entire "family" of Steiner/Waldorf/anthroposophy articles on wikipedia. Fred Bauder was clear that the basic problem is using only or mainly anthroposophical sources to "document" that anthroposophy is the greatest thing since sliced bread. There are a couple dozen such articles that are exactly that - little mini-brochures that function to suggest anthroposophy does so many wonderful things for mankind. Like I say, the arbitration was in January, and it is clearly quite all right with the anthropsophists who have written all these articles that they sit forever and ever like this if no one hollers. I'm saying, either get to work fixing them or they should be deleted. Wikipedia isn't free advertising.DianaW 12:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The article now has adequate independent references.Hgilbert 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)