Talk:Sunlight (Spacey Jane album)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 23:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them here. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Marcostev8, I'm pausing here to give you a chance to respond to the source review (2b) before we wrap up on prose/comprehensiveness, since those might get tweaked during the source review. Let me know your responses - the article's in pretty good shape overall! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey @Ganesha811, thanks for the feedback! As for my responses to 2b:
 * I believe Pilerats to be a reliable source. It is a well-established online music publication founded in 2011 with a sizeable team that writes about new local releases, interviews and reviews. They also produce professional live music content. They have been an invaluable resource reading about emerging bands from Western Australia, particularly their early interviews with Spacey Jane. In many cases they provide the only solid information online about some indie musicians, by talking directly to the artists themselves.
 * Cool, seems fine.
 * Tone Deaf is a reliable source - they constantly post Aussie music news and original interviews with well-known bands with the Chats, San Cisco and the Buoys all having write-ups from the past week or so. A lot of their journalists also write for Rolling Stone Australia as both are under the parent company, The Brag.
 * Ditto.
 * I'm removing Indie Is Not a Genre from the Critical Reception section as I can't prove its reliability. However, am I able to keep that reference in discussion of the musical qualities of the album (2nd para of Composition)? I think the author Ben Malkin still provides an objective and valuable insight into Spacey Jane's production and influences, even if it's not a well established website.
 * I think it'd be ok to keep it for that purpose, yes.
 * I've replaced the deadlinked reference from the Northern Beaches Review with the same article published by Tasmania's The Examiner (same article, published under multiple mastheads).
 * I've removed mention of "Booster Seat" being the sixth single for now, as I can't find a source that says what date it was made a single.
 * Thank you, keen for your response! Marcostev8 (talk) 09:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * All looking good, thanks for the changes. —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Marcostev8, just a couple more things to do (2a, 3a) and I've got to do a copyvio spot check, and then I think we should be all set! —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey @Ganesha811, I believe I've taken on board all feedback. In terms of the personnel credits, they are sourced from the liner notes (standard according to WP:PERSONNEL) – does this still need a citation? If not, all should be good. Thanks! Marcostev8 (talk) 10:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This article now meets the GA standard. Congrats to you and anyone else who worked on it! —Ganesha811 (talk) 12:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)