Talk:Sunny Li

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Sunny Li concert.jpg

Page clean up
Hello reviewer, I, first of all, want to say that I'm a friend of Li and came here after a long discussion with her. Her page was tagged for various issues and I would like someone to review the page to fix the issue. My requests are below:

Since these tags were first placed the page was significantly cleaned up, unsupported information was removed and does not read promotional so, I want to request the reviewer to remove these tags and add the picture. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.62.175 (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Please add her picture on her page. The link to her picture is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sunny_Li_concert_in_Geneva.jpg
 * As per the history of her page in November 2017, someone tagged it with "This article needs additional citations for verification." At that time her biography paragraph wasn't having sources for verification, but on 14 January 2018‎, most of the information was deleted by a user named Bri so that tag is unwarranted because all the information is now sourced.
 * In October 2017,‎ another tag UDP was added. The tag says "This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments." After the tag was placed a disclosure was also added on this talk page and the page was significantly edited and cleaned up as mentioned on the tag by the same user Bri so, this tag does not apply.
 * In February 2017‎, a tag COI was placed and a year after, the page was cleanup as mentioned in the tag by user Bri and a few more users so, this tag is also invalid.

Reply 23-MAR-2020
Regards, Spintendo  13:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC) Thank you Spintendo. sir User:Bri can you review the page and comment which part of the page is still promotional and not sourced so the tags can be removed because they were added before you cleaned up this page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.62.175 (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) ✅ I have placed the image in the article.
 * 2) ❌ With regards to the maintenance templates, it is recommended that, as a courtesy, you first try asking the editor who assigned the template in order to find out from them if it can be removed. Since they placed the template, they are in the best position to know whether or not the issues which caused its placement have been corrected. You may contact them directly by placing a new message on their talk page. In the unlikely event that you do not hear back from them after a reasonable amount of time, please reopen this request by altering the  template's answer parameter to read from yes to no.


 * is there a good reason for replacing UDP tag? The tag itself reads: "It may require clean-up to comply with Wikipedia's content policies." I see the paid editing was disclosed at the top of this page and the article was significantly cleaned up by multiple users. WP:TMC state: " Their purposes are to foster improvement of the encyclopedia by alerting editors to changes that need to be made. Cleanup tags are meant to be temporary notices that lead to an effort to fix the problem, not a permanent badge of shame to show that you disagree with an article, or a method of warning readers about an article." so, what was the reason to re-tag? Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 04:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It contains promotional text like "In March 2017, it was announced that she would be going on a spring tour of the United Kingdom". I am not seeing how that announcement is notable? Instead it looks like an advert for her upcoming tour at the time.
 * And yes this article was originally created for payment. A bunch of the sources are not particularly good / are broken.
 * The one who started this section also looks paid. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 14:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for sharing your thoughts, I have removed that line completely as un-verifiable and repaired those broken links. The article now looks natural as compared to this when it was created for payment. Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 16:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And what is your relation to the topic in question User:Murgh Krahi? It is clear from above that this person is still trying to pay people to improve their page. So undisclosed paid editing is ongoing not just in the past. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no relation with the topic in question . As per the history it looks all the paid edits were removed and the article now look natural. If you think the paid editing is ongoing the page can be protected from editing. Do you still believe it need cleanup? Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * It been more than 24 hours and you have not replied. Is there anything else to clean in the article? Best Murgh Krahi (talk) 19:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Will need independent review. User:GSS User:Bri your thoughts? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The most recent possible paid edit reverted by me was in July 2019, it was poorly written and was completely unsourced, but the version as it stands now looks okay to me. GSS  &#128172; 05:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * your thoughts? Murgh Krahi (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)