Talk:Sunset Park (Brooklyn park)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments That's it, niff-naff and trivia. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 11:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "41st and 44th Streets and 5th and 7th Avenues" none of these have articles?
 * They do not. Roads in Brooklyn tend to not be that notable. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "and pool.[1] The " just the one citation in the lead is odd, as long as it's mentioned and cited in the main article, no need for that in the lead.
 * "in 1891 through 1905" could we "from 1891 to 1905" instead?
 * "the last glacial period" this appears to be capitalised in our article.
 * "of New York Harbor; Manhattan; the Statue of Liberty; an" why semi-colons? commas would be fine, right?
 * "also a playground at" linked here but not in the lead?
 * "facade" link?
 * You link brick but not granite....
 * I believe you have also linked terracotta in other similar articles.
 * I think locker room (BritEng: changing room) deserves a link more than swimming pool (BritEng: swimming pool!) ...
 * "comfort station" is that a bathroom?
 * Yes.
 * "A Times" New York variant?
 * Yes.
 * "60-foot ladders" convert.
 * "October 1934.[47][45] " order.
 * "Native American" link.
 * "WPA funded pools" hyphenated WPA-funded.
 * "to open.[50][51][b] It opened " awkward.
 * "65-foot slope" convert.
 * "5.8 million" inflate?
 * "only had " ->" had only".
 * Refs 68 and 69 need en-dashes, not hyphens.
 * I fixed the citations entirely. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "., pp. 200–205" spare comma?
 * The page numbers were somehow outside the citation template. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "Native American" link.
 * "WPA funded pools" hyphenated WPA-funded.
 * "to open.[50][51][b] It opened " awkward.
 * "65-foot slope" convert.
 * "5.8 million" inflate?
 * "only had " ->" had only".
 * Refs 68 and 69 need en-dashes, not hyphens.
 * I fixed the citations entirely. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "., pp. 200–205" spare comma?
 * The page numbers were somehow outside the citation template. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "only had " ->" had only".
 * Refs 68 and 69 need en-dashes, not hyphens.
 * I fixed the citations entirely. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "., pp. 200–205" spare comma?
 * The page numbers were somehow outside the citation template. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "., pp. 200–205" spare comma?
 * The page numbers were somehow outside the citation template. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. As always I've fixed all of these. Epicgenius (talk) 16:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Jolly good, no qualms to promote this now, nice work. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!&#33;!&#33;) 16:27, 26 March 2021 (UTC)