Talk:Super AMOLED

merge proposal
I think it would be better to merge this to the AMOLED article. It's basically an improved cell phone version of the AMOLED. That being said you should also think of editing the discussion of this article.--MartianH (talk) 15:12, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree Cooldra01 (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2011 (UTC)


 * This is a marketing term invented by Samsung. It shouldn't have it's own article. 123.203.147.78 (talk) 16:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Agreed. It's essentially Samsung's brand of AMOLED displays. (I did this myself in September last year, but the original page creator moved it back a month later.) Pilchard (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree with everything said thus far, except that: "It's essentially Samsung's brand of AMOLED displays" is incorrect. AMOLED is, essentially, a Samsung technology.  without getting too specific about all of various "other" applications of AMOLED, other than phones and TVs (like microwaves, DVD player readouts, car audio decks, digital wrist watches, etc.), I will say that Samsung is the manufacturer of the AMOLED screens used by their smartphone competitors.  Nokia, Motorola, HTC, etc. all purchase bulk AMOLED as electronic components directly from samsung, and use them in their own phones.  Rumor had it that when the iPhone 4S was still being designed, and the Samsung-Apple relatinship was still good, Apple had considered using Samsung AMOLED screens in the design.  They scrapped the idea because Samsung's supply chain was not robust enough to supply the demand for Apple's products.68.6.76.31 (talk) 01:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the claim that the display is 18% more efficient this is against the last AMOLED display according to the footnote, we may want to source against conventional phone displays (I'm not sure what to compare it to). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.132.162 (talk) 21:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)